Cantitate/Preț
Produs
Total produse
Vezi coșul
Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics de Frans H. Van Eemeren

Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics: Argumentation Library, cartea 27

Autor Frans H. Van Eemeren
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 22 oct 2016
This volume presents 50 contributions on the themes of reasonableness and effectiveness and their connections, which are central issues in argumentation theory. It discusses van Eemeren’s views on the study of argumentation; the approach to argumentation adopted in pragma-dialectics; pragma-dialectical perspectives on the dialectical and pragmatic dimensions of argumentative discourse; the notion of strategic maneuvering; the pragma-dialectical method of analyzing argumentative discourse; the treatment of fallacies as violations of rules for critical discussion; pragma-dialectical views on context, the role of logic, verbal indicators of argumentative moves and argument schemes; and the process of writing and rewriting argumentative texts. The pragma-dialectical quantitative approach to empirical research on argumentative discourse is illustrated by reporting on selected, illustrative experimental studies, as well as qualitative studies of historical cases.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Argumentation Library

Preț: 64553 lei

Preț vechi: 75945 lei
-15%

Puncte Express: 968
Paperback 64553 lei
Hardback 70448 lei

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 05-19 decembrie

Livrare prin curier în România Termenul estimat este afișat lângă disponibilitate.
Transport gratuit pentru acest produs Plată online sau ramburs, în funcție de opțiunile comenzii.
Retur gratuit în 14 zile Comandă securizată și suport în română.
 Adaugă în coș

Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!
Adaugă în listă

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9783319373737
ISBN-10: 3319373730
Pagini: 904
Ilustrații: XXIV, 904 p. 35 illus.
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 1.28 kg
Ediția:Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2015
Editura: Springer International Publishing
Colecția Springer
Seria Argumentation Library

Locul publicării:Cham, Switzerland

Cuprins

 Argumentation.- The language of argumentation in Dutch.- In what sense do modern argumentation theories relate to Aristotle? The case of pragma-dialectics.- Bingo! Promising developments in argumentation theory.- Argumentation studies’ five estates.- The study of argumentation as normative pragmatics.- From ideal model to situated argumentative discourse: The step-by-step development of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation.- The case of pragma-dialectics.- The pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation in discussion.

Recenzii

“The book under review … is the first publication to allow us a glimpse into the workshop of pragma-dialectics in its full glory. … there is no place like this book for academics and practitioners to appreciate the enormous richness of the pragmadialectical research program in all its different phases and facets.” (Fernando Leal, Argumentation, Vol. 30, 2016)

Textul de pe ultima copertă

This volume presents 50 contributions on the themes of reasonableness and effectiveness and their connections, which are central issues in argumentation theory. It discusses van Eemeren’s views on the study of argumentation; the approach to argumentation adopted in pragma-dialectics; pragma-dialectical perspectives on the dialectical and pragmatic dimensions of argumentative discourse; the notion of strategic maneuvering; the pragma-dialectical method of analyzing argumentative discourse; the treatment of fallacies as violations of rules for critical discussion; pragma-dialectical views on context, the role of logic, verbal indicators of argumentative moves and argument schemes; and the process of writing and rewriting argumentative texts. The pragma-dialectical quantitative approach to empirical research on argumentative discourse is illustrated by reporting on selected, illustrative experimental studies, as well as qualitative studies of historical cases.

Caracteristici

Gather the insights gained in 30 years of ongoing research on argumentative discourse Reflects the life’s work of a prominent and leading figure in all areas of argumentation Will especially be of value to scholars interested in the genesis of pragma-dialectical theory Underscores the central importance of reasonableness and effectiveness in the theory of argumentation Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras

Notă biografică

Frans H. van Eemeren is Professor of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric at the University of Amsterdam. Together with Rob Grootendorst (1944-2000) he founded the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Van Eemeren a Distinguished Scholar of the American National Communication Association, Doctor Honoris Causa of the University of Lugano, and alumnus of the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences. He is President of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), Editor-in-Chief of the interdisciplinary journal Argumentation, and Editor of the book series Argumentation Library and Argumentation in Context. Among the monographs he (co)authored are Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions (1984), Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies (1992), Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse (1993), Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory (1996), A Systematic Theory of Argumentation (2004), Argumentative Indicators in Discourse (2007), Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness (2009), and Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse (2010). Bart Garssen is Lecturer at the Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric of the University of Amsterdam, and Director of the Master¿s program Discourse and Argumentation Studies Amsterdam (DASA). He is Book Editor of the interdisciplinary journal Argumentation, and Editor of the book series Argumentation in Context. His research interests are empirical research of argumentation, political argumentation and the fallacies. Together with Frans H. van Eemeren and Bert Meuffels he published Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness (2009). C.W. Krabbe (1943) studied philosophy and mathematics at the University of Amsterdam. His Ph.D. dissertation, Studies in Dialogical Logic (Groningen, 1982) was supervised by E.M. Barth and by K. Lorenz. Together with E.M. Barth, he wrote From Axiom to Dialogue (1982), a comprehensive study of dialectic systems and their connections with other types of logic. His publications focus on dialogue logic and argumentation. Krabbe is an alumnus of the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences and an Editor of the interdisciplinary journal Argumentation. Krabbe taught logic at the University of Amsterdam and at the University of Utrecht. From 1988 until 2008 he was an Associate Professor of Logic at the Faculty of Philosophy of the University of Groningen, teaching both philosophical and mathematical logic and theory of argumentation. In 1995 he was, moreover, appointed as Professor on a special chair for Philosophical Theory of Argumentation. Together with D.N. Walton he co-authored the monograph Commitment in Dialogue (1995). In 1998 Krabbe received an ISSA-award for excellent research. He retired in 2008. A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans is an Associate Professor in the Department of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric of the University of Amsterdam. She us Director of the Research Master¿s program Rhetoric, Argumentation theory, and Philosophy (RAP). Her research concentrated on linguistic characteristics of argumentation and argumentation structures. In 2007 she published, together with Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser, the monograph Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. Her current research focuses on the role of stylistic devices in strategic manoeuvring aimed at balancing the pursuit of rhetorical effectiveness with dialectical reasonableness. Snoeck Henkemans is a member of the Editorial Board of the journal Informal Logic. Bart Verheij is a tenured lecturer and researcher at the Institute of Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Engineering (ALICE) of the University of Groningen. In 2013-2014, he is resident fellow at the CodeX center for legal informatics, Stanford University. He holds an MSc degree in Mathematics (University of Amsterdam) and obtained his PhD degree at Maastricht Univer