Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Knowledge for Development?: Comparing British, Japanese, Swedish and World Bank Aid

Autor Kenneth King, Simon McGrath
en Limba Engleză Paperback – feb 2004
In 1996, the World Bank President, James Wolfensohn, declared that his organization would henceforth be 'the knowledge bank'. This marked the beginning of a new discourse of knowledge-based aid, which has spread rapidly across the development field. This book is the first detailed attempt to analyse this new discourse.

Through an examination of four agencies -- the World Bank, the British Department for International Development, the Japan International Cooperation Agency and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency -- the book explores what this new approach to aid means in both theory and practice. It concludes that too much emphasis has been on developing capacity within agencies rather than addressing the expressed needs of Southern 'partners'. It also questions whether knowledge-based aid leads to greater agency certainty about what constitutes good development.
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 24218 lei

Preț vechi: 31482 lei
-23%

Puncte Express: 363

Preț estimativ în valută:
4288 4992$ 3725£

Carte disponibilă

Livrare economică 02-16 februarie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781842773253
ISBN-10: 1842773259
Pagini: 256
Dimensiuni: 216 x 136 x 20 mm
Greutate: 0.28 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Zed Books
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom

Cuprins

1. Researching Knowledge-Based Aid
2. The New Aid Agenda
3. Knowledge for Development
4. The World Bank or the Knowledge Bank?
5. From Information Management to Knowledge Sharing: DFID's Unfinished Revolution
6. Knowledge, Learning and Capacity in the Swedish Approach to Development Cooperation
7. Experience, Experts and Knowledge in Japanese Aid Policy and Practice
8. Conclusions and Implications for Knowledge, Aid and Development

Recenzii

In this excellent book the authors present a detailed analysis and a balanced assessment of the prospects for knowledge-based aid to achieve the goal of improving aid-effectiveness. Based on conceptual framework setting and a close examination of actual experience they reach the conclusion that success depends on reconceptualizing aid itself, in the direction of capacity building in poor countries.
Knowledge management is popular. Aid agencies talk easily of sharing stories, communities of practice and double-loop learning. But are they ready to sacrifice a preoccupation with results and a concern to disseminate 'best-practice' - in favour of real partnership and mutual learning across divergent networks? McGrath and King are sceptical. Their case studies and their thesis challenge all of us involved in the production, sharing, and use of knowledge.