Saul Kripke: Continuum Contemporary American Thinkers
Autor Arif Ahmeden Limba Engleză Paperback – 9 iun 2007
| Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
|---|---|---|
| Paperback (1) | 194.76 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
| Bloomsbury Publishing – 9 iun 2007 | 194.76 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
| Hardback (1) | 794.07 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
| Bloomsbury Publishing – 9 iun 2007 | 794.07 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 194.76 lei
Puncte Express: 292
Preț estimativ în valută:
34.43€ • 41.05$ • 29.86£
34.43€ • 41.05$ • 29.86£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 17-31 martie
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780826492623
ISBN-10: 0826492622
Pagini: 192
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.23 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Continuum
Seria Continuum Contemporary American Thinkers
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 0826492622
Pagini: 192
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.23 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Continuum
Seria Continuum Contemporary American Thinkers
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
Cuprins
1. Introduction
2. Names
3. Necessity
4. Rule-Following
5. Private Language
Bibliography
2. Names
3. Necessity
4. Rule-Following
5. Private Language
Bibliography
Recenzii
"This is a lovely book - crystal clear exposition, concise lucid criticism." - Laurence Goldstein, University of Kent, UK.
"This book is an insightful and thorough analysis of Kripke's major contributions to philosophy...Arif Ahmed's book is a good example of analytical work which combines critical analysis of Kripe's arguments from Naming and Necessity with more discursive analysis of his skeptical argument, and a more interpretive treatment of the skeptical solution. As Ahmed admits, his aim was not to refute Kripke's views, only to present objections to them. Without a doubt, this aim has been fully accomplished." -Anton Petrenko, Philosophy in Review
"This book is an insightful and thorough analysis of Kripke's major contributions to philosophy...Arif Ahmed's book is a good example of analytical work which combines critical analysis of Kripe's arguments from Naming and Necessity with more discursive analysis of his skeptical argument, and a more interpretive treatment of the skeptical solution. As Ahmed admits, his aim was not to refute Kripke's views, only to present objections to them. Without a doubt, this aim has been fully accomplished." -Anton Petrenko, Philosophy in Review