Saul Kripke: Continuum Contemporary American Thinkers
Autor Arif Ahmeden Limba Engleză Hardback – 9 iun 2007
Preț: 798.15 lei
Preț vechi: 928.08 lei
-14%
Puncte Express: 1197
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 09-23 iulie
Livrare prin curier în România Termenul estimat este afișat lângă disponibilitate.
Transport gratuit pentru acest produs Plată online sau ramburs, în funcție de opțiunile comenzii.
Retur gratuit în 14 zile Comandă securizată și suport în română.
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780826492616
ISBN-10: 0826492614
Pagini: 192
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 14 mm
Greutate: 0.4 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Continuum
Seria Continuum Contemporary American Thinkers
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 0826492614
Pagini: 192
Dimensiuni: 138 x 216 x 14 mm
Greutate: 0.4 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Continuum
Seria Continuum Contemporary American Thinkers
Locul publicării:London, United Kingdom
Cuprins
1. Introduction
2. Names
3. Necessity
4. Rule-Following
5. Private Language
Bibliography
2. Names
3. Necessity
4. Rule-Following
5. Private Language
Bibliography
Recenzii
'This is a lovely book - crystal clear exposition, concise lucid criticism.' Laurence Goldstein, University of Kent, UK.
"This book is an insightful and thorough analysis of Kripke's major contributions to philosophy...Arif Ahmed's book is a good example of analytical work which combines critical analysis of Kripe's arguments from Naming and Necessity with more discursive analysis of his skeptical argument, and a more interpretive treatment of the skeptical solution. As Ahmed admits, his aim was not to refute Kripke's views, only to present objections to them. Without a doubt, this aim has been fully accomplished." -Anton Petrenko, Philosophy in Review
"This book is an insightful and thorough analysis of Kripke's major contributions to philosophy...Arif Ahmed's book is a good example of analytical work which combines critical analysis of Kripe's arguments from Naming and Necessity with more discursive analysis of his skeptical argument, and a more interpretive treatment of the skeptical solution. As Ahmed admits, his aim was not to refute Kripke's views, only to present objections to them. Without a doubt, this aim has been fully accomplished." -Anton Petrenko, Philosophy in Review