Interpreting Intersectionality: Interpretative Politics in Metacommentaries: The Feminist Imagination - Europe and Beyond
Autor Amund Rake Hoffarten Limba Engleză Paperback – 6 mai 2025
| Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
|---|---|---|
| Paperback (1) | 381.38 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
| Taylor & Francis – 6 mai 2025 | 381.38 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
| Hardback (1) | 1013.30 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
| Taylor & Francis – dec 2023 | 1013.30 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 381.38 lei
Puncte Express: 572
Preț estimativ în valută:
67.47€ • 78.45$ • 58.49£
67.47€ • 78.45$ • 58.49£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 04-18 martie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781032446998
ISBN-10: 1032446994
Pagini: 166
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 10 mm
Greutate: 0.3 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria The Feminist Imagination - Europe and Beyond
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 1032446994
Pagini: 166
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 x 10 mm
Greutate: 0.3 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria The Feminist Imagination - Europe and Beyond
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
Public țintă
PostgraduateNotă biografică
Amund Rake Hoffart is Researcher at the Centre for Gender Research, University of Oslo.
Cuprins
List of tables
Acknowledgements
1 Introduction: Metacommentaries and the charge of misapplication
2 Telling intersectional stories
3 Intersectional intersectionality
4 Ambivalent histories
5 The quest for the right metaphor
6 Conclusion: On the interpretative politics of intersectionality
References
Index
Acknowledgements
1 Introduction: Metacommentaries and the charge of misapplication
2 Telling intersectional stories
3 Intersectional intersectionality
4 Ambivalent histories
5 The quest for the right metaphor
6 Conclusion: On the interpretative politics of intersectionality
References
Index
Descriere
This book explores the genre of metacommentaries as critical responses to the development of intersectionality as a paradigm, contending that far from re-connecting intersectionality with its roots and enabling it to realise its potential, such critiques bind the scholarly discourse to an either/or argumentative dynamic.