Cantitate/Preț
Produs
Total produse
Vezi coșul
What If Derrida Was Wrong about Saussure?: Feminine Writing in the Major Novels de Russell Daylight

What If Derrida Was Wrong about Saussure?: Feminine Writing in the Major Novels

Autor Russell Daylight
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 31 dec 2010 – vârsta de la 22 ani
Over the past 100 years there has been no more important reading of Saussurean linguistics than that of Jacques Derrida. This book is the first comprehensive analysis on the importance of that reading and what it means for cultural studies, philosophy, linguistics and literary theory today. The main themes of the text include the originality of Saussure within the history of Western metaphysics, the relationship between speech and writing, and the intervention of time in structuralism.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 24161 lei  6-8 săpt.
  EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY PRESS – 12 mar 2012 24161 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 57062 lei  6-8 săpt.
  EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY PRESS – 31 dec 2010 57062 lei  6-8 săpt.

Preț: 57062 lei

Preț vechi: 73254 lei
-22% Nou

Puncte Express: 856
Preț estimativ în valută:
10096€ • 11762$ • 8816£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 20 ianuarie-03 februarie 26

 Adaugă în coș

Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!
Adaugă în listă
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780748641970
ISBN-10: 0748641971
Pagini: 196
Dimensiuni: 157 x 234 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.57 kg
Editura: EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY PRESS

Cuprins

Introduction; Chapter 1: Classical Semiology; Chapter 2: The Originality of Saussure; Chapter 3: The Concept of the Sign; Chapter 4: Writing, Speech and the Voice; Chapter 5: The Sign as Representation; Chapter 6: Linguistic Identity; Chapter 7: The Sign and Time; Chapter 8: The Horizon of Language.

Notă biografică

Recenzii

"'Daylight's microscopic analysis is matched with a telescopic gaze over what stands or falls on whether Derrida was right about Saussure across a broad range of intellectual fields. His study contributes at least as much to our understanding of the philosopher-historian as of the philologist-grammarian, and marks a sea change in the reception of both. That is no mean feat. To have achieved it with such clarity of exposition, elegance of expression and depth of insight makes this book a rare and indispensable tour de force.' Times Higher Education"