Cantitate/Preț
Produs
Total produse
Vezi coșul
The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy de Maite Ezcurdia

The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy

Editat de Maite Ezcurdia, Robert J. Stainton
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 14 mar 2013
The boundary between semantics and pragmatics has been important since the early twentieth century, but in the last twenty-five years it has become the central issue in the philosophy of language. This anthology collects classic philosophical papers on the topic, along with recent key contributions. It stresses not only the nature of the boundary, but also its importance for philosophy generally.
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 46560 lei

Preț vechi: 55207 lei
-16%

Puncte Express: 698
Preț estimativ în valută:
8242€ • 9573$ • 7140£

Carte disponibilă

Livrare economică 10-24 februarie

 Adaugă în coș

Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!
Adaugă în listă
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781554810697
ISBN-10: 1554810698
Pagini: 600
Dimensiuni: 165 x 229 x 22 mm
Greutate: 0.75 kg
Editura: BROADVIEW PR
Colecția Broadview Press
Locul publicării:Peterborough, Canada

Recenzii

The boundary between semantics and pragmatics has been important since the early twentieth century, but in the last twenty-five years it has become the central issue in the philosophy of language. This anthology collects classic philosophical papers on the topic, along with recent key contributions. It stresses not only the nature of the boundary, but also its importance for philosophy generally.

“A highly useful collection containing many influential papers, including a number of classic pieces. It is a natural choice for survey courses in semantics and pragmatics.” — Scott Soames, Distinguished Professor; Director, USC School of Philosophy
“A wide-ranging collection of must-read articles on philosophical topics pertaining to, revolving around, or just straddling the line between semantics and pragmatics.” — Kent Bach, Professor Emeritus, San Francisco State University
“Ezcurdia and Stainton provide an elegant overview of the different ways to understand the distinction between semantics and pragmatics, and the main attempts to locate the boundary between them. They have selected the definitive papers that bring into focus the significance of finding this boundary, and its implications for the study of metaphor, for the relation between thought and language, and for contemporary discussions of contextualism and relativism. This anthology is an ideal text for any course in philosophy, linguistics, or cognitive science that is aimed at introducing undergraduate or graduate students to the potential scope and limits of systematic semantic theorizing.” — Susanna Siegel, Edgar Pierce Professor of Philosophy, Harvard University

Cuprins

Preface
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Part I: Canonical Foundations
  1. Peter F. Strawson, “On Referring” (1950)
  2. J.L. Austin, “Performative Utterances” (1956)
  3. Keith S. Donnellan, “Reference and Definite Descriptions” (1966)
  4. H. Paul Grice, “Logic and Conversation” (1967/1975)
  5. Saul Kripke, “Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference” (1977)
  6. David Kaplan, “Demonstratives” and “Afterthoughts” (1977/1989)
  7. Robert C. Stalnaker, “Assertion” (1978)
  8. David Lewis, “Scorekeeping in a Language Game” (1979)
  9. John Perry, “Thought without Representation” (1986)
  10. Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson, “Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition” (1987)
Part II: Pragmatic Determinants of What Is Said
  1. John R. Searle, “Literal Meaning” (1978)
  2. Robyn Carston, “Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics” (1988)
  3. Kent Bach, “Conversational Impliciture” (1994)
  4. Jason Stanley, “Context and Logical Form” (2000)
  5. François Récanati, “Unarticulated Constituents” (2002)
  6. Reinaldo Elugardo and Robert J. Stainton, “Shorthand, Syntactic Ellipsis, and the Pragmatic Determinants of What Is Said” (2004)
  7. Herman Cappelen and Ernie Lepore, “A Tall Tale: In Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism” (2004)
  8. Emma Borg, “Minimalism versus Contextualism in Semantics” (2007)
Part III: Case Studies
A. Metaphor
  1. Donald Davidson, “What Metaphors Mean” (1978)
  2. John R. Searle, “Metaphor” (1979)
  3. Catherine Wearing, “Metaphor and What Is Said” (2006)
B. Knowledge and Mind
  1. David Lewis, “Elusive Knowledge” (1996)
  2. Jennifer M. Saul, “Substitution and Simple Sentences” (1997)
  3. Max Kölbel, “Faultless Disagreement” (2003)
Sources