The issue of whether or not the Genesis creation took place so many moons ago is yet another highly controversial hot topic in the world of religion and society, one that has created no small amount of drama on its own, one side steadfastly arguing that a supernatural deity did in fact create the world mankind knows all too well, opponents of such an ideology steadfastly asserting that such a belief is pure nonsense, both sides of the argument swearing up and down they are right. But who's really correct when it comes to this. In this book, The Fable of the Genesis Creation I do my absolute best being a lifelong non-believer to answer that very question by expressing my belief that mankind was not a result of so-called "divine intervention" and take great pains to point out (many of the idiosyncrasies and outright contradictions found in god's supposedly infallible "Good Book," which, after even the most cursory review one would find it nearly impossible to logically deem "infallible." Additionally, I've included arguments from a scientific perspective asserting my beliefs of a far more naturalistic origin for mankind than what most religious adherents will lead you to believe, the natural world around us being logically undeniable proof that no such omnipotent deity created the universe in which humans live. Will these views, irrespective of how docile and objective be accepted by the Christian ranks? Well, simply put, I think you'd have better luck raising the Titanic with a pair of tweezers and sewing thread. To end, mankind has been led for millennia to believe that a supernatural being created all living things in on this lonely planet, my intention with this book being to show that such could not be any further from the truth.