The Evaluation Game: How Publication Metrics Shape Scholarly Communication
Autor Emanuel Kulczyckien Limba Engleză Paperback – 27 apr 2023
Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
---|---|---|
Paperback (1) | 230.01 lei 3-5 săpt. | +14.84 lei 5-11 zile |
Cambridge University Press – 27 apr 2023 | 230.01 lei 3-5 săpt. | +14.84 lei 5-11 zile |
Hardback (1) | 530.27 lei 3-5 săpt. | +25.36 lei 5-11 zile |
Cambridge University Press – 27 apr 2023 | 530.27 lei 3-5 săpt. | +25.36 lei 5-11 zile |
Preț: 230.01 lei
Puncte Express: 345
Preț estimativ în valută:
44.03€ • 47.75$ • 37.10£
44.03€ • 47.75$ • 37.10£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 28 octombrie-11 noiembrie
Livrare express 12-18 octombrie pentru 24.83 lei
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781009351195
ISBN-10: 1009351192
Pagini: 246
Greutate: 0.39 kg
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Locul publicării:Cambridge, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 1009351192
Pagini: 246
Greutate: 0.39 kg
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Colecția Cambridge University Press
Locul publicării:Cambridge, United Kingdom
Cuprins
Introduction; 1. Evaluation as power; 2. Economization and metricization; 3. Untold histories of research evaluation; 4. The diversity of evaluative powers; 5. Players and the stakes; 6. Playing the evaluation game; Conclusions; Acknowledgements; References; Index.
Notă biografică
Descriere
This text examines the origin and effects of publication metrics that are used to measure academic productivity around the world.
Recenzii
'Research evaluation has taken very different forms under different bureaucracies and political systems. Kulczycki makes a unique contribution by explaining some 'untold histories of research evaluation' from Eastern Europe and comparing metric-based evaluation models under socialist and neoliberal regimes.' Ismael Rafols, Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden
'Emanuel Kulczycki is uniquely positioned to provide this highly insightful critique of the relationship between academia and the state in research evaluation systems. In this book, evaluation is not merely an event of which researchers are the sole object or beneficiary but a process that is inextricably tied to issues of trust, communication, discipline diversity and the power of the state. Only by reconciling these relationships can we move to more responsible research evaluation and address academic resistance.' Gemma Derrick, Centre for Higher Education Transformations, University of Bristol
'The author uses the metaphor in the title to emphasize the competitive environment in which scientific research takes place. He shows the extent to which research evaluation originates (also) from the government. In this context, he points out a remarkable difference between the West (USA and Western Europe) and the former Eastern Bloc. In the West, researchers have more confidence in colleagues, via peer review, while in the former East Bloc, there is a historic distrust in authorities (experts), and hence a preference for bibliometric indicators. The book draws attention to power relations in science and as such is a useful read, not only for information scientists but also for sociologists and political scientists who want to take a glonacal (global-national-local) perspective.' Ronald Rousseau, KU Leuven and University of Antwerp
'Emanuel Kulczycki is uniquely positioned to provide this highly insightful critique of the relationship between academia and the state in research evaluation systems. In this book, evaluation is not merely an event of which researchers are the sole object or beneficiary but a process that is inextricably tied to issues of trust, communication, discipline diversity and the power of the state. Only by reconciling these relationships can we move to more responsible research evaluation and address academic resistance.' Gemma Derrick, Centre for Higher Education Transformations, University of Bristol
'The author uses the metaphor in the title to emphasize the competitive environment in which scientific research takes place. He shows the extent to which research evaluation originates (also) from the government. In this context, he points out a remarkable difference between the West (USA and Western Europe) and the former Eastern Bloc. In the West, researchers have more confidence in colleagues, via peer review, while in the former East Bloc, there is a historic distrust in authorities (experts), and hence a preference for bibliometric indicators. The book draws attention to power relations in science and as such is a useful read, not only for information scientists but also for sociologists and political scientists who want to take a glonacal (global-national-local) perspective.' Ronald Rousseau, KU Leuven and University of Antwerp