Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Explaining Evil: Four Views

Editat de Dr W. Paul Franks
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 21 feb 2019
In Explaining Evil four prominent philosophers, two theists and two non-theists, present their arguments for why evil exists. Taking a "position and response" format, in which one philosopher offers an account of evil and three others respond, this book guides readers through the advantages and limitations of various philosophical positions on evil, making it ideal for classroom use as well as individual study.

Divided into four chapters, Explaining Evil covers Theistic Libertarianism, Theistic Compatibilism, Atheistic Moral Realism and Atheistic Moral Non-realism. It features topics including free will, theism, atheism, goodness, Calvinism, evolutionary ethics, and pain, and demonstrates some of the dominant models of thinking within contemporary philosophy of religion and ethics.

Written in accessible prose and with an approachable structure, this book provides a clear and useful overview of the central issues of the philosophy of evil.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 18649 lei  43-57 zile
  Bloomsbury Publishing – 21 feb 2019 18649 lei  43-57 zile
Hardback (1) 55136 lei  43-57 zile
  Bloomsbury Publishing – 21 feb 2019 55136 lei  43-57 zile

Preț: 55136 lei

Preț vechi: 83513 lei
-34%

Puncte Express: 827

Preț estimativ în valută:
9761 11366$ 8480£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 23 februarie-09 martie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781501331145
ISBN-10: 1501331140
Pagini: 192
Dimensiuni: 140 x 216 mm
Greutate: 0.37 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Locul publicării:New York, United States

Cuprins

Notes on Contributors
Acknowledgements

Introduction, W. Paul Franks (Tyndale University College, Canada)

1. Evil and Agent-Causal Theism, Richard Brian Davis (Tyndale University College, Canada)
Response to Richard Brian Davis
Paul Helm (Regent College, Canada)
Michael Ruse (Florida State University, USA)
Erik Wielenberg (DePauw University, USA)
Reply to Critics

2. Evil and Christian Classical Theism, Paul Helm (Regent College, Canada)
Response to Paul Helm
Richard Brian Davis (Tyndale University College, Canada)
Michael Ruse (Florida State University, USA)
Erik Wielenberg (DePauw University, USA)
Reply to Critics

3. Evil and Atheistic Moral Skepticism, Michael Ruse (Florida State University, USA)
Response to Michael Ruse
Richard Brian Davis (Tyndale University College, Canada)
Paul Helm (Regent College, Canada)
Erik Wielenberg (DePauw University, USA)
Reply to Critics

4. Evil and Atheistic Moral Realism, Erik J. Wielenberg (DePauw University, USA)
Response to Michael Ruse
Richard Brian Davis (Tyndale University College, Canada)
Paul Helm (Regent College, Canada)
Erik Wielenberg (DePauw University, USA)
Reply to Critics
Recommended Reading
Bibliography
Index

Recenzii

The tone is civil, but the critical interactions are lively and uninhibited ... The book is rounded out with an excellent recommended reading section . and an extensive bibliography emphasizing recent (some of it very recent) literature. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.
This an outstanding book on the problem of evil. Instead of addressing the enduring debate over the value of evil as evidence against theism, the contributors to this book consider how evil fits into their theistic or atheistic perspectives. Anyone interested in the problem of evil-even those who feel that they have already read enough about the topic-should find the book intriguing and eye-opening.
Encountering Evil is an interesting volume, and worth a read. The book provides a concise overview of four approaches relevant to discussions of human morality, and relevant to discussions of the problem of evil. The book would provide a useful textbook for an undergraduate seminar on theism and morality, or a seminar on the problem of evil.
What a splendid book this is! [A]ll four make many excellent points. Would that all academic debates could be conducted in such a respectful manner.