Dismantling American Common Law
Autor Kyle Scotten Limba Engleză Hardback – dec 2007
| Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
|---|---|---|
| Paperback (1) | 291.06 lei 43-57 zile | |
| Bloomsbury Publishing – 18 iun 2008 | 291.06 lei 43-57 zile | |
| Hardback (1) | 669.50 lei 22-36 zile | |
| Bloomsbury Publishing – dec 2007 | 669.50 lei 22-36 zile |
Preț: 669.50 lei
Preț vechi: 787.64 lei
-15%
Puncte Express: 1004
Preț estimativ în valută:
118.40€ • 138.94$ • 102.69£
118.40€ • 138.94$ • 102.69£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 16 februarie-02 martie
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780739123768
ISBN-10: 0739123769
Pagini: 186
Dimensiuni: 157 x 235 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.4 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
ISBN-10: 0739123769
Pagini: 186
Dimensiuni: 157 x 235 x 15 mm
Greutate: 0.4 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Notă biografică
Kyle Scott is assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of North Florida.
Descriere
Dismantling American Common Law provides new insights into the political implications and philosophical origins of the American common law tradition, the importance of which has largely been ignored by the political science community.
Cuprins
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Chapter 1. Defining the Common Law and Surveying the Literature
Chapter 3 Chapter 2. Debating the Common Law in America
Chapter 4 Chapter 3. An Evaluation of the Factors that have led to the Dismantling
Chapter 5 Chapter 4. The Decline in the Use of Juries
Chapter 6 Chapter 5. Equity, Sovereign Immunity, and Consequences
Chapter 7 Chapter 6. Montesquieu as the Intellectual Forerunner
Chapter 8 Conclusion
Chapter 2 Chapter 1. Defining the Common Law and Surveying the Literature
Chapter 3 Chapter 2. Debating the Common Law in America
Chapter 4 Chapter 3. An Evaluation of the Factors that have led to the Dismantling
Chapter 5 Chapter 4. The Decline in the Use of Juries
Chapter 6 Chapter 5. Equity, Sovereign Immunity, and Consequences
Chapter 7 Chapter 6. Montesquieu as the Intellectual Forerunner
Chapter 8 Conclusion
Recenzii
America's abandonment of its original legal-political tradition is a timely topic, given concerns about the judicializing of politics and how to foster the rule of law in our democratic era. The eclipse of the traditional common law in academia and the courts removes a pillar of constitutional democracy. Kyle Scott shows that this is the crucial missing context for our debates about powerful lawyers and litigation, and about judicial activism. Students of law, judicial power, and political development will profit from this display that old ideas and authors guide the spirit of current policies and disputes.
This fine scholarly book contains ample, carefully compiled footnotes and an excellent bibliography....Recommended.
This perspective offers a new lens to ask questions about democracy, authority, and stability....Scott can add to this pursuit an appreciation for quantitative methods, which is well regarded in social science history. By asking theoretical questions and testing for variables drawn from that inquiry, Scott is encouraging an expansion of methods in studies of legal development.
Common law normally escapes the attention of political scientists. Kyle Scott breaks this unfortunate tradition with an imaginative study that weds traditional jurisprudential and philosophical arguments with sophisticated empirical cross-state comparative analysis. Common law practices have eroded in the American states and Scott's analysis alerts us to the importance of this change and to the underlying political processes that fueled this transformation.
This fine scholarly book contains ample, carefully compiled footnotes and an excellent bibliography....Recommended.
This perspective offers a new lens to ask questions about democracy, authority, and stability....Scott can add to this pursuit an appreciation for quantitative methods, which is well regarded in social science history. By asking theoretical questions and testing for variables drawn from that inquiry, Scott is encouraging an expansion of methods in studies of legal development.
Common law normally escapes the attention of political scientists. Kyle Scott breaks this unfortunate tradition with an imaginative study that weds traditional jurisprudential and philosophical arguments with sophisticated empirical cross-state comparative analysis. Common law practices have eroded in the American states and Scott's analysis alerts us to the importance of this change and to the underlying political processes that fueled this transformation.