Cantitate/Preț
Produs
Total produse
Vezi coșul
Discussions in Dispute Resolution: The Foundational Articles de Art Hinshaw

Discussions in Dispute Resolution: The Foundational Articles

Editat de Art Hinshaw, Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Sarah Rudolph Cole
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 7 sep 2021

Problema centrală pe care o rezolvă Discussions in Dispute Resolution este lipsa de perspectivă critică asupra fundamentelor teoretice care guvernează astăzi arbitrajul și medierea. Într-un domeniu care a evoluat rapid de la periferia sistemului judiciar către centrul practicii juridice moderne, practicienii riscă adesea să aplice mecanisme fără a înțelege evoluția lor doctrinară. Apreciem acest volum pentru modul riguros în care distilează deceniul 2000-2009, o perioadă de maturizare în care procesele alternative au încetat să mai fie o rebeliune împotriva instanțelor, devenind standard profesional.

Structura cărții este una de tip dialog, un element distinctiv rar în literatura juridică. Nu avem de-a face doar cu o antologie de texte, ci cu o dezbatere vie: fiecare dintre cele 16 scrieri selectate este supusă analizei a patru comentatori diferiți, oferind cititorului o viziune 360 de grade asupra relevanței acestora. Credem că această abordare este esențială pentru a înțelege cum s-au cristalizat conceptele de negociere și politici publice în contextul american și internațional. Cititorul care a aplicat ideile din Dispute Processing and Conflict Resolution va găsi aici continuarea firească a analizei, trecând de la fundamentele istorice la consolidarea practică a domeniului.

Spre deosebire de Settling Disputes, care funcționează ca un ghid de metode inovatoare, lucrarea de față, publicată de Oxford University Press, oferă o profunzime academică superioară, fiind un instrument de reflecție asupra succeselor și limitărilor metodelor de soluționare a conflictelor. Tonul este unul sobru, analitic, orientat spre rezultate concrete, forțând cititorul să privească dincolo de procedură, către substanța deciziei juridice. Este o resursă indispensabilă pentru cei care doresc să stăpânească arta rezolvării disputelor nu doar ca tehnică, ci ca filosofie de drept aplicat.

Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 77840 lei

Preț vechi: 112635 lei
-31%

Puncte Express: 1168
Hardback (2) de la 68728 lei

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 09-14 octombrie

Livrare prin curier în România Termenul estimat este afișat lângă disponibilitate.
Transport gratuit pentru acest produs Plată online sau ramburs, în funcție de opțiunile comenzii.
Retur gratuit în 14 zile Comandă securizată și suport în română.
 Adaugă în coș

Wish list
Gift list
Am citit!
Adaugă în listă

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780197513248
ISBN-10: 0197513247
Pagini: 440
Dimensiuni: 160 x 241 x 23 mm
Greutate: 0.82 kg
Editura: Oxford University Press
Colecția OUP USA
Locul publicării:New York, United States

De ce să citești această carte

Această carte este esențială pentru avocați, mediatori și arbitri care doresc să înțeleagă arhitectura intelectuală a profesiei lor. Veți câștiga o înțelegere profundă a celor 16 texte care au definit rezolvarea disputelor în secolul XXI. Este un instrument critic care vă permite să vedeți cum au evoluat strategiile de negociere și mediere, oferindu-vă un avantaj competitiv în argumentarea și gestionarea conflictelor complexe prin prisma experienței celor mai mari experți din domeniu.

Despre autor

Volumul este coordonat de trei figuri proeminente ale mediului academic juridic american. Art Hinshaw este profesor la Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, specializat în etica negocierii. Andrea Kupfer Schneider este recunoscută internațional pentru cercetările sale în domeniul negocierii și al diplomației, fiind profesor la Marquette University Law School. Sarah Rudolph Cole este expertă în arbitraj și mediere la Ohio State University, cu o activitate vastă în analiza sistemelor de soluționare a disputelor. Împreună, acești editori au selectat și structurat contribuțiile care au transformat Oxford University Press într-o autoritate în domeniu.

Descriere

While arbitration was robust in colonial and early America, dispute resolution lost its footing to the court system as the United States grew into a bustling and burgeoning country. And while dispute resolution processes emerged briefly from time to time, they were dormant until the enactment of the Federal Arbitration Act and collective bargaining grew out of the labor movement. But it wasn't until 1976, when Frank Sander delivered his famous remarks at the Pound Conference, that the modern dispute resolution movement was born. By the year 2000, alternative dispute resolution had transformed from a populist rebellion against the judicial system to mainstream legal practice. Today, lawyers and retiring judges look to arbitration and mediation for a career pivot, and law schools train law students in the finer arts of dispute resolution practice as both providers and advocates.Discussions in Dispute Resolution brings together the modern dispute resolution field's most influential commentaries in its first few decades and reflects on what makes these pieces so important. This book collects 16 foundational writings, four pieces from each of the field's primary subfields--negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and public policy. Each piece has four commenters who answer the question: why is this work a foundational piece in the dispute resolution field? The purpose in asking this simple question is fourfold: to hail the field's foundational generation and their work, to bring a fresh look at these articles, to engage the articles' original authors where possible, and to challenge the articles with the benefit of hindsight. Where possible, the book gives the authors of the original pieces the opportunity either to reflect on the piece itself or to respond to the other commenters.

Notă biografică

Art Hinshaw is the John J. Bouma Fellow, the Founding Director of the Lodestar Dispute Resolution Center, and a Clinical Professor of Law at the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University. Professor Hinshaw's scholarship focuses on mediation and negotiation theory and practice, and he is a co-author on the 6th edition of the classic textbook Dispute Resolution & Lawyers: A Contemporary Approach and author of numerous articles and book chapters. Currently he is a member of the ABA's Standing Committee on Mediator Ethical Guidance and a regular contributor to Indisputably: the ADR Prof Blog. He is a former member of the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct.Andrea Kupfer Schneider is a Professor of Law, the inaugural director of the Institute for Women's Leadership at Marquette University and the Director of the law school's nationally ranked dispute resolution program. She frequently publishes law review articles and book chapters on negotiation, gender, and international conflict and has co-authored several leading legal textbooks on ADR, Negotiation, Mediation and Plea Bargaining. Andrea is a founding editor of Indisputably, the blog for ADR law faculty and started the Dispute Resolution Works-in-Progress Annual Conference in 2007. She was named 2009 Woman of the Year by the Wisconsin Law Journal and, in 2016, gave her first TEDx talk entitled Women Don't Negotiate and Other Similar Nonsense. She was named the 2017 recipient of the ABA Section of Dispute Resolution Award for Outstanding Scholarly Work.Sarah Rudolph Cole is the Michael E. Moritz Chair in Alternative Dispute Resolution, Moritz College of Law, Ohio State University; Professor Cole clerked on the Ninth Circuit for Eugene A. Wright. She practiced labor and employment law and was on the faculty at Creighton University School of Law before joining the Moritz faculty in 1998. She is co-author, with Nancy Rogers, James Coben, Peter Thompson and Craig McEwen of Mediation: Law, Policy and Practice and Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation and Other Processes with Nancy Rogers, Stephen Goldberg and Frank Sander. She is the director of the Program on Dispute Resolution at Moritz. In 2013, Ohio State awarded her the Alumni Award for Distinguished Teaching. She serves on arbitration and mediation panels for AAA and the State of Ohio and visited at Harvard Law School in Fall 2019.

Cuprins

  • Introduction
  • PART 1: INTERVIEWING AND COUNSELING
  • Article 1.1: Good Lawyers Should Be Good Psychologists: Insights for Interviewing and Counseling Clients (2008)--Jean R. Sternlight and Jennifer K. Robbennolt
  • Comments:
  • Erin Archerd--(Ir)rational Thinking and the Law
  • Gilat Bachar--More (Than) Just Lawyering
  • Lauren Newell--Interviewing and Counseling with Gen Z
  • Jean R. Sternlight and Jennifer K. Robbennolt--Maybe We Can Fill That Glass
  • PART 2: NEGOTIATION
  • Article 2.1: When People are the Means: Negotiating with Respect (2001)--Jonathan R. Cohen
  • Comments:
  • Jennifer Brown--"Respect" in Negotiation (and Other Persuasive Relationships)
  • Noam Ebner--Big-E Ethics and little-e ethics in Negotiation
  • Jennifer Reynolds--More Meta, More Problems
  • Jonathan R. Cohen-The Ethical Duty to Listen and Consider
  • Article 2.2: Aspirations and Settlement (2002)--Russell Korobkin
  • Comments:
  • Michael Colatrella--The Complexity of High Aspirations
  • Noam Ebner--Embracing Messiness in Negotiation Theory
  • Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff--Modeling Hope: Economic Aspirations in Negotiation
  • Russell Korobkin--Aspirations in Negotiation: Descriptive and Prescriptive
  • Article 2.3: Shattering Negotiation Myths: Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Negotiation Style (2002)--Andrea Kupfer Schneider
  • Comments:
  • Cynthia Alkon--Shattering Negotiation Myths and Building New Foundations
  • Alyson Carrel--Shaping the Future of Law Starting by Shattering Negotiation Myths
  • Katrina Lee--Enduring Impact: Portrait of the Effective Lawyer Negotiator
  • Andrea Kupfer Schneider--Was Getting to Yes Getting it Right?
  • Article 2.4: Apologies and Legal Settlement: An Empirical Examination (2003)--Jennifer K. Robbennolt
  • Comments:
  • Jacqueline N. Font-Guzmán--The Power of Apologies and the Pursuit of Justice...
  • Dwight Golann--Do Apologies Matter in Civil Litigation? And If They Do, Why Are They So Rare?
  • Oladeji M. Tiamiyu--Robbennolt's Analysis of the Contextual Role and Value of Apologies in Legal Settlement
  • Jennifer K. Robbennolt--Developing an Empirical Understanding of Apologies in Law
  • PART 3: MEDIATION
  • Article 3.1: Making Deals in Court-Connected Mediation: What's Justice Got To Do with It (2001)--Nancy A. Welsh
  • Comments:
  • Hiro Aragaki--Making It Real
  • Deborah Thompson Eisenberg--Mediation and Procedural Justice: Where Are We Now?
  • Jacqueline Nolan-Haley--Revisiting Deals and Justice in Court-Connected Mediation
  • Nancy A. Welsh--Procedural Justice and Settlement
  • Article 3.2: Court-Connected Mediation in General Civil Cases: What We Know from Empirical Research (2002)--Roselle L. Wissler
  • Comments:
  • Lydia Nussbaum--Empiricism Undaunted
  • Peter R. Reilly--Insights from a Dispute Resolution Empiricist: Preparation, Fairness, and Party Empowerment in Mediation
  • Rachel A. Viscomi--A Mirror to Help Us Improve: Reflecting on Roselle Wissler's Court-Connected Mediation in General Civil Cases: What We Know from Empirical Research
  • Roselle L. Wissler--We Have More to Learn About Mediation from Empirical Research
  • Article 3.3: Suing Mediators (2003)--Michael Moffitt
  • Comments:
  • Rishi Batra--Suing Mediators - A Lack of Liability Hurts Us All
  • Sharon Press--Revisiting Suing Mediators
  • Omer Shapira--The Significance of Suing Mediators
  • Michael Moffitt--Twenty Years After Suing Mediators
  • Article 3.4: Disputing Irony: A Systematic Look at Litigation about Mediation (2006)--James R. Coben and Peter N. Thompson
  • Comments:
  • Ellen E. Deason--Praise (and Gentle Criticism) for Using U.S. Litigation Statistics to Praise (and Gently Criticize) Domestic and International Mediation Policy Choices
  • Art Hinshaw--Is Litigation about Mediation Ironic?
  • Andrew Mamo--Embracing Irony
  • James R. Coben and Peter N. Thompson--Disputing Irony Revisited
  • PART 4: ARBITRATION
  • Article 4.1: Managerial Litigants? The Overlooked Problem of Party Autonomy in Dispute Resolution (2000)--Sarah Rudolph Cole
  • Comments:
  • Carli Conklin--Enduring Questions of Authority, Integrity, Consistency, and Predictability in Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards
  • Brian Farkas--The Heart of It: Dispute Resolution's Private-Public Tension
  • Rafael Gely--A Dispute Systems Design Perspective on Managerial Litigants? The Overlooked Problem of Party Autonomy in Dispute Resolution
  • Sarah Rudolph Cole--How Should Courts Review Managerial Litigants' Procedural Rulemaking?
  • Article 4.2: As Mandatory Binding Arbitration Meets the Class Action, Will the Class Action Survive? (2000)--Jean R. Sternlight
  • Comments:
  • Richard Bales--The Lasting Significance of Jean Sternlight's 2000 Article in Contemporary Dispute Resolution
  • Alexander J.S. Colvin--When Mandatory Binding Arbitration Met the Class Action: Why We Were Right to Worry
  • Maureen A. Weston--Strategic Shifts: The Corporate Playbook on Arbitration, Class Actions, Mass Arbitration, and Privatized Justice
  • Jean R. Sternlight--What Happens When King Kong Meets Godzilla?: Using Mandatory Arbitration Clauses to Eliminate Class Actions
  • Article 4.3: Saturns for Rickshaws: The Stakes in the Debate Over Predispute Employment Arbitration Agreements (2001)--Samuel Estreicher
  • Comments:
  • Michael Z. Green--The Brilliance of Explaining Mandatory Arbitration as a Choice Between Saturns and Rickshaws
  • E. Gary Spitko--Employment Arbitration Heresies
  • W. Mark C. Weidemaier--What Cars Should be Allowed on the Road?
  • Samuel Estreicher--Employment Arbitration: Towards a Hearing on the Merits for Most Americans
  • Article 4.4: In Defense of Southland: Reexamining the Legislative History of the Federal Arbitration Act (2002)--Christopher R. Drahozal
  • Comments:
  • Jill I. Gross--The Danger of Binary Thinking: Drahozal on Southland
  • Imre Stephen Szalai--The Real Southland Decision: Drahozal's Trailblazing Article
  • Stephen J. Ware--Drahozal's Defense of Southland
  • Christopher R. Drahozal--In Defense of Southland: Arbitration Law, Federalism, and Legal Scholarship
  • PART 5: SYSTEMIC ISSUES
  • Article 5.1: Possibilities for Collaborative Law: Ethics and Practice of Lawyer Disqualification and Process Control in a New Model of Lawyering (2003)--John Lande
  • Comments:
  • Debra Berman--Collaborative Law: Questioning a Novel Process
  • Kristen M. Blankley--Ethical Alarm Bells Surrounding Collaborative Law Lead to Solid Foundation for Practice
  • Kelly Browe Olson--Collaborative Law and IPV Concerns
  • John Lande--Possibilities for Early Dispute Resolution
  • Article 5.2: The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials and Related Matters in Federal and State Courts (2004)--Mark Galanter
  • Comments:
  • Lisa Blomgren Amsler--Galanter's Systemic Analysis of How Repeat Players Reduced Trials
  • Yael Efron--The Effects of Marc Galanter's Worldwide Legacy on Legal Practice, Scholarship, Education, and Society
  • Sheila Heen--Marc Galanter: Everything, Everywhere, All at Once
  • John Lande--The Phenomenon Known as The Vanishing Trial
  • Article 5.3: An Analytic Framework for Dispute Systems Design (2009)--Stephanie Smith and Janet Martinez
  • Comments:
  • Grande Lum--Don't Just Love the Playa, Love the Game: Appreciating An Analytic Framework for Dispute Systems Design
  • Carrie Menkel-Meadow--A Systematic Approach to Dispute Systems Design: Commentary on An Analytic Framework for Dispute Systems Design
  • Guillermo Garcia Sanchez--Global Impact and Legacy: Smith and Martinez' Framework for International Dispute System Design
  • Stephanie Smith and Janet Martinez--Dispute System Design: Where We've Come From and Where We're Heading
  • Conclusion