Terrorism and the Constitution: The Post-9/11 Cases
Autor H. L. Pohlmanen Limba Engleză Paperback – 7 oct 2007
Preț: 323.94 lei
Preț vechi: 415.18 lei
-22%
Puncte Express: 486
Preț estimativ în valută:
57.34€ • 66.99$ • 49.77£
57.34€ • 66.99$ • 49.77£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 25 februarie-11 martie
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780742560413
ISBN-10: 0742560414
Pagini: 323
Dimensiuni: 153 x 231 x 21 mm
Greutate: 0.54 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
Locul publicării:New York, United States
ISBN-10: 0742560414
Pagini: 323
Dimensiuni: 153 x 231 x 21 mm
Greutate: 0.54 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Cuprins
Part 1 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance: In re Sealed Case
Chapter 2 Background
Chapter 3 Brief of the United States
Chapter 4 Oral Argument
Chapter 5 Amici Curiae Briefs and the Government's Supplemental Brief
Chapter 6 FISA Court Review Decision
Chapter 7 Postscript
Part 8 Detention of Citizen Enemy Combatants: Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Rumsfeld v. Padilla
Chapter 9 Rumsfeld v. Padilla
Chapter 10 Background
Chapter 11 Briefs Filed at the Supreme Court in Hamdi and Padilla
Chapter 12 Oral Arguments in Hamdi and Padilla
Chapter 13 The Decision
Chapter 14 Postscript
Part 15 Aliens Detained Abroad: Rasul v. Bush
Chapter 16 Background
Chapter 17 Legal Briefs Filed in Rasul
Chapter 18 Excerpts from Briefs filed in Rasul
Chapter 19 Oral Arguments in Rasul
Chapter 20 The Decision
Chapter 21 Postscript
Part 22 Civilian Trials of High-Profile Terrorists
Chapter 23 Background
Chapter 24 Briefs Filed at the 4th Circuit
Chapter 25 Oral Argument
Chapter 26 4th Circuit's Decision
Chapter 27 Postscript
Part 28 Military Trials
Chapter 29 Background
Chapter 30 The Briefs
Chapter 31 Oral Argument
Chapter 32 The Decision
Chapter 33 Postscript
Chapter 2 Background
Chapter 3 Brief of the United States
Chapter 4 Oral Argument
Chapter 5 Amici Curiae Briefs and the Government's Supplemental Brief
Chapter 6 FISA Court Review Decision
Chapter 7 Postscript
Part 8 Detention of Citizen Enemy Combatants: Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Rumsfeld v. Padilla
Chapter 9 Rumsfeld v. Padilla
Chapter 10 Background
Chapter 11 Briefs Filed at the Supreme Court in Hamdi and Padilla
Chapter 12 Oral Arguments in Hamdi and Padilla
Chapter 13 The Decision
Chapter 14 Postscript
Part 15 Aliens Detained Abroad: Rasul v. Bush
Chapter 16 Background
Chapter 17 Legal Briefs Filed in Rasul
Chapter 18 Excerpts from Briefs filed in Rasul
Chapter 19 Oral Arguments in Rasul
Chapter 20 The Decision
Chapter 21 Postscript
Part 22 Civilian Trials of High-Profile Terrorists
Chapter 23 Background
Chapter 24 Briefs Filed at the 4th Circuit
Chapter 25 Oral Argument
Chapter 26 4th Circuit's Decision
Chapter 27 Postscript
Part 28 Military Trials
Chapter 29 Background
Chapter 30 The Briefs
Chapter 31 Oral Argument
Chapter 32 The Decision
Chapter 33 Postscript
Recenzii
Pohlman has done something very useful: provided a carefully edited selection of briefs, argument transcripts, and other materials bearing on the major terrorism cases that have been decided since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. These materials provide essential background to understanding a series of cases that deal with fundamental issues of civil liberties and national security.
This book provides documents from major post-9/11 cases that highlight central constitutional issues raised by the war on terror.
H.L. Pohlman's careful selection and editing of materials makes it possible for readers to understand the complex legal issues arising out of the war on terrorism, and, even more important, to evaluate the legal arguments and come to their own conclusions about how our Constitution should respond to the realities of the twenty-first century.
This book provides documents from major post-9/11 cases that highlight central constitutional issues raised by the war on terror.
H.L. Pohlman's careful selection and editing of materials makes it possible for readers to understand the complex legal issues arising out of the war on terrorism, and, even more important, to evaluate the legal arguments and come to their own conclusions about how our Constitution should respond to the realities of the twenty-first century.