Spanning the Theory-Practice Divide in Library and Information Science
Autor Bill Crowleyen Limba Engleză Paperback – 13 dec 2004
It also addresses the implications for theory development of fundamental aspects of the American culture and economy, including: the American ambivalence towards intellectuals, the rise in the "theory-unfriendly" environments of for-profit educational institutions, and public demands for enhanced accountability.
Preț: 459.32 lei
Preț vechi: 665.16 lei
-31%
Puncte Express: 689
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 21 iulie-04 august
Livrare prin curier în România Termenul estimat este afișat lângă disponibilitate.
Transport gratuit pentru acest produs Plată online sau ramburs, în funcție de opțiunile comenzii.
Retur gratuit în 14 zile Comandă securizată și suport în română.
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780810851658
ISBN-10: 0810851652
Pagini: 240
Dimensiuni: 137 x 205 x 20 mm
Greutate: 0.32 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Scarecrow Press
Locul publicării:New York, United States
ISBN-10: 0810851652
Pagini: 240
Dimensiuni: 137 x 205 x 20 mm
Greutate: 0.32 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Scarecrow Press
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Cuprins
Part 1 Preface
Part 2 Acknowledgments
Chapter 3 1. Theorizing for Diverging Contexts: Why Research Results and Theory Development Are So Little Used Outside the Campus; Scenario: "The People in the Audience Only Have Master's Degrees"
Chapter 4 2. Developing a Research Philosophy; Scenario: The Views of a Swedish Master Cabinetmaker
Chapter 5 3. The Revival of Pragmatism; Scenario: What Goes Around Comes Around
Chapter 6 4. Tacit Knowledge: Bridging the Theory-Practice Divide; Scenario: Improving Reference Effectiveness in Maryland
Chapter 7 5. The Academic as Practicioner; Scenario: Telling Tales Out of School
Chapter 8 6. The Practicioner as Academic: Adjunct Facility/Lecturers; Scenario: Tricks of the Teaching Trade
Chapter 9 7. Other Worlds of Practice: The Field Practicioner; Scenario: "Piled Higher and Deeper"
Chapter 10 8. Other Worlds of Practice: The Consultant; Scenario: Bias in the Library Board Room
Chapter 11 9. Theory and Revelation; Scenario: God and Research in a Catholic University
Chapter 12 10. The Foundations for Building Bridges; Scenario: When in Rome...
Part 13 Postscript
Part 14 Glossary
Part 15 Works Cited
Part 16 Index
Part 17 About the Author
Part 2 Acknowledgments
Chapter 3 1. Theorizing for Diverging Contexts: Why Research Results and Theory Development Are So Little Used Outside the Campus; Scenario: "The People in the Audience Only Have Master's Degrees"
Chapter 4 2. Developing a Research Philosophy; Scenario: The Views of a Swedish Master Cabinetmaker
Chapter 5 3. The Revival of Pragmatism; Scenario: What Goes Around Comes Around
Chapter 6 4. Tacit Knowledge: Bridging the Theory-Practice Divide; Scenario: Improving Reference Effectiveness in Maryland
Chapter 7 5. The Academic as Practicioner; Scenario: Telling Tales Out of School
Chapter 8 6. The Practicioner as Academic: Adjunct Facility/Lecturers; Scenario: Tricks of the Teaching Trade
Chapter 9 7. Other Worlds of Practice: The Field Practicioner; Scenario: "Piled Higher and Deeper"
Chapter 10 8. Other Worlds of Practice: The Consultant; Scenario: Bias in the Library Board Room
Chapter 11 9. Theory and Revelation; Scenario: God and Research in a Catholic University
Chapter 12 10. The Foundations for Building Bridges; Scenario: When in Rome...
Part 13 Postscript
Part 14 Glossary
Part 15 Works Cited
Part 16 Index
Part 17 About the Author
Recenzii
...essential reading for LIS professionals interested in producing research and theory that are truly useful.
Spanning the Theory-Practice Divide in Library & Information Science, by Bill Crowley, is an analysis of the reasons why 'faculty-generated scholarship' is often irrelevant, seldom applied, or sometimes unacknowledged by practitioners. The author discusses this 'gap' between theoretical and pragmatic worlds from the points of view of practitioners and academics, as well as others outside of campus boundaries....The analyses and references will be useful for those conducting research in this area......
Crowley's down-to-earth writing style and his ideas are easy to comprehend and persuasive. If LIS faculty take his arguments seriously, they will be motivated to begin (or to continue) to translate their theoretical work into terms understood by practitioners. Practitioners who read his book will better understand the intellectual and social environment in which LIS faculty work and, I would hope, make greater effort to understand LIS faculty theory....Bill Crowley has written a book that will inform many and have a useful impact on the development of theory that improves library practice. Indeed, by studying his analysis and arguments, educators and practitioners in all professions will understand better both the divide between theory and practice in their fields and a philosophy that will help them bridge that gap.
The two major strengths of Spanning the Theory-Practice Divide in Library & Information Science are that (1) the work addresses an important area of disconnect in the discipline and the profession and (2) the discussion is supported by the presentation of broader philosophical and theoretical principles that have defined a range of disciplines. In addition, Crowley's inclusion of examples and analogies from his professional life and the analysis of issues from a variety of disciplines provides for an interesting and timely publication...
With so much of today's LIS literature devoted to the implementation of technology and its impact, it is refreshing to see this single-authored monograph solely devoted to promoting the value of theory in our profession....the book reflects an amazing depth of professional experience...highly recommended.
Library educator Bill Crowley examines why there has been a gulf between theory and practice in librarianship. In Spanning the Theory-Practice Divide in Library and Information Science, Crowley explains how practitioners as well as faculty can use theories derived from actual experience to solve real-world problems. He also considers why theory developed by academics is often overlooked by practitioners and addresses American ambivalence toward intellectuals.
Crowley's pragmatic analysis has three basic purposes: to show why theory developed in academia is too little used off campus; to explore why it's in the interests of library faculty members, consultants, and practitioners to change this; and to provide suggestions for making academic theory and research more useful in nonacademic environments. He also addresses a primary roadblock to change - why theory that has little or no perceived relevance outside academe can be essential to career advancement in university contexts. It's a work, he writes, without villains; he notes that there are long-standing and understandable reasons for the mismatch between the imperatives of research and the needs of practice. He seeks not to close the divide, but to identify ways to bridge it.
Crowley is well-qualified to discuss the division between practitioner and scholar....I enjoyed reading Spanning the Theory-Practice Divide in Library and Information Science and reflecting on Crowley's ideas....I hope that library educators and researchers consider using this approach in their works.
Spanning the Theory-Practice Divide in Library & Information Science, by Bill Crowley, is an analysis of the reasons why 'faculty-generated scholarship' is often irrelevant, seldom applied, or sometimes unacknowledged by practitioners. The author discusses this 'gap' between theoretical and pragmatic worlds from the points of view of practitioners and academics, as well as others outside of campus boundaries....The analyses and references will be useful for those conducting research in this area......
Crowley's down-to-earth writing style and his ideas are easy to comprehend and persuasive. If LIS faculty take his arguments seriously, they will be motivated to begin (or to continue) to translate their theoretical work into terms understood by practitioners. Practitioners who read his book will better understand the intellectual and social environment in which LIS faculty work and, I would hope, make greater effort to understand LIS faculty theory....Bill Crowley has written a book that will inform many and have a useful impact on the development of theory that improves library practice. Indeed, by studying his analysis and arguments, educators and practitioners in all professions will understand better both the divide between theory and practice in their fields and a philosophy that will help them bridge that gap.
The two major strengths of Spanning the Theory-Practice Divide in Library & Information Science are that (1) the work addresses an important area of disconnect in the discipline and the profession and (2) the discussion is supported by the presentation of broader philosophical and theoretical principles that have defined a range of disciplines. In addition, Crowley's inclusion of examples and analogies from his professional life and the analysis of issues from a variety of disciplines provides for an interesting and timely publication...
With so much of today's LIS literature devoted to the implementation of technology and its impact, it is refreshing to see this single-authored monograph solely devoted to promoting the value of theory in our profession....the book reflects an amazing depth of professional experience...highly recommended.
Library educator Bill Crowley examines why there has been a gulf between theory and practice in librarianship. In Spanning the Theory-Practice Divide in Library and Information Science, Crowley explains how practitioners as well as faculty can use theories derived from actual experience to solve real-world problems. He also considers why theory developed by academics is often overlooked by practitioners and addresses American ambivalence toward intellectuals.
Crowley's pragmatic analysis has three basic purposes: to show why theory developed in academia is too little used off campus; to explore why it's in the interests of library faculty members, consultants, and practitioners to change this; and to provide suggestions for making academic theory and research more useful in nonacademic environments. He also addresses a primary roadblock to change - why theory that has little or no perceived relevance outside academe can be essential to career advancement in university contexts. It's a work, he writes, without villains; he notes that there are long-standing and understandable reasons for the mismatch between the imperatives of research and the needs of practice. He seeks not to close the divide, but to identify ways to bridge it.
Crowley is well-qualified to discuss the division between practitioner and scholar....I enjoyed reading Spanning the Theory-Practice Divide in Library and Information Science and reflecting on Crowley's ideas....I hope that library educators and researchers consider using this approach in their works.