Rousseau’s Republicanism: The Hope of the Just
Autor Megan K. Dyeren Limba Engleză Hardback – 12 sep 2023
Looking to both major works and lesser-known writings, this book demonstrates that, in the face of human finitude and the formidable demands of right, Rousseau crafts a robust yet judicious account of the republic. Through comparison with various republican lineages, its chapters explore Rousseau's engagement with leading moral and political problems that have defined and redefined republicanism: attaining virtue, preserving liberty, sustaining the social order, orienting persons toward the common good, and having the law rule over men. The goods of civil association are always precarious, yet Rousseau nonetheless recognizes in human community an answer to the great problems of his thought-those of inequality, unhappiness, and unfreedom.
Preț: 493.85 lei
Preț vechi: 745.38 lei
-34%
Puncte Express: 741
Preț estimativ în valută:
87.32€ • 103.04$ • 76.47£
87.32€ • 103.04$ • 76.47£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 13-27 aprilie
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781666918373
ISBN-10: 1666918377
Pagini: 236
Dimensiuni: 158 x 232 x 22 mm
Greutate: 0.5 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Lexington Books
Locul publicării:New York, United States
ISBN-10: 1666918377
Pagini: 236
Dimensiuni: 158 x 232 x 22 mm
Greutate: 0.5 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Lexington Books
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Cuprins
Introduction
Chapter 1: A Republic of Virtue
Chapter 2: Well-Ordered Liberty
Chapter 3: True Society
Chapter 4: Common Goods, Limited Conventions
Chapter 5: Every Legitimate Government is Republican
Conclusion
Chapter 1: A Republic of Virtue
Chapter 2: Well-Ordered Liberty
Chapter 3: True Society
Chapter 4: Common Goods, Limited Conventions
Chapter 5: Every Legitimate Government is Republican
Conclusion
Recenzii
This is a properly fresh study, one that declines to tread closely in the footsteps of any particular tradition of interpretation to which its author was already antecedently committed ... This is a lucid, intelligent study of Rousseau's political thought, marked by good judgment throughout, and Dyer's is a significant new voice in Anglophone Rousseau studies.
Dyer sets out to answer whether Jean-Jacques Rousseau proposed a viable theory of republican government. After all, Rousseau's political ideas have been rejected because they allegedly led to tyranny. Dyer, however, defends Rousseau's republic. She argues that in Rousseau's republic, citizens are more virtuous, the republic does not pursue an empire, and commerce does not corrupt. Against those who claim that Rousseau removed man's grounding in nature, Dyer argues that Rousseau's conventions remain rooted in nature, and against those who claim that Rousseau's republic is devoid of proper ends, she argues that love of the community guides republican citizens. Readers will receive the latter argument skeptically, but it is to Dyer's credit that she clearly states her case, allowing readers to quarrel with her. Dyer's conclusion-that future republican politics would benefit from more, not less, Rousseau-is grounded in an impressive knowledge of Rousseau, his philosophical interlocutors, and Dyer's full command of the secondary literature. Her argument has not been made, at least in a while, and scholars should take her up on her challenge. Recommended. Graduate students and faculty.
"Megan K. Dyer offers bold and refreshing interpretations of both Rousseau and republican theory. This learned and provocative consideration is sure to engage scholars for many years to come."
Many have attempted to untangle the republican strands of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's republicanism, but few have been successful. One successful author, Megan Dyer, is in not only understanding Rousseau's republican principles, but in connecting them so persuasively to the republican tradition. This will be essential reading for those eager to understand both Rousseau and republicanism more broadly.
Dyer sets out to answer whether Jean-Jacques Rousseau proposed a viable theory of republican government. After all, Rousseau's political ideas have been rejected because they allegedly led to tyranny. Dyer, however, defends Rousseau's republic. She argues that in Rousseau's republic, citizens are more virtuous, the republic does not pursue an empire, and commerce does not corrupt. Against those who claim that Rousseau removed man's grounding in nature, Dyer argues that Rousseau's conventions remain rooted in nature, and against those who claim that Rousseau's republic is devoid of proper ends, she argues that love of the community guides republican citizens. Readers will receive the latter argument skeptically, but it is to Dyer's credit that she clearly states her case, allowing readers to quarrel with her. Dyer's conclusion-that future republican politics would benefit from more, not less, Rousseau-is grounded in an impressive knowledge of Rousseau, his philosophical interlocutors, and Dyer's full command of the secondary literature. Her argument has not been made, at least in a while, and scholars should take her up on her challenge. Recommended. Graduate students and faculty.
"Megan K. Dyer offers bold and refreshing interpretations of both Rousseau and republican theory. This learned and provocative consideration is sure to engage scholars for many years to come."
Many have attempted to untangle the republican strands of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's republicanism, but few have been successful. One successful author, Megan Dyer, is in not only understanding Rousseau's republican principles, but in connecting them so persuasively to the republican tradition. This will be essential reading for those eager to understand both Rousseau and republicanism more broadly.