Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Nuclear Weapons and Coercive Diplomacy

Autor Todd S. Sechser
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 2 feb 2017

În analiza relațiilor internaționale contemporane, aplicabilitatea practică a arsenalului nuclear este adesea redusă la conceptul de descurajare. Volumul Nuclear Weapons and Coercive Diplomacy, semnat de Todd S. Sechser și publicat de Cambridge University Press, intervine critic în această paradigmă, explorând dacă amenințarea atomică poate fi utilizată eficient pentru a forța un adversar să cedeze teritorii sau să își schimbe conduita politică. Observăm că autorii demontează mitul „șantajului nuclear” succesiv, demonstrând prin date riguroase că posesia acestor arme oferă beneficii aproape exclusiv defensive.

Structura lucrării facilitează o parcurgere progresivă: prima parte stabilește cadrul teoretic al scepticismului nuclear, urmată de secțiuni dedicate tendințelor în negocierea de criză și disputelor teritoriale. Partea a treia este deosebit de valoroasă prin studiile de caz care analizează eșecurile strategiei de tip „brinkmanship” și reevaluează victoriile nucleare atribuite eronat în istoriografie. Această abordare metodologică, ce îmbină analiza cantitativă cu cea istorică, oferă o rigoare superioară lucrărilor pur teoretice.

Considerăm această carte o alternativă necesară la Nuclear Reactions de Mark S. Bell pentru cursurile de securitate internațională și diplomație. În timp ce Bell sugerează că armele nucleare permit statelor să își diversifice strategiile de politică externă, Sechser și colaboratorii săi aduc argumente solide care limitează utilitatea acestora la palierul defensiv. De asemenea, lucrarea completează temele abordate de autor în Emerging Technologies and International Stability, unde Todd S. Sechser analiza modul în care noile tehnologii reconfigurează competiția între marii actori globali, păstrând aceeași preocupare pentru stabilitatea sistemică.

Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 24431 lei

Puncte Express: 366

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 02-16 iunie


Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781107514515
ISBN-10: 1107514517
Pagini: 348
Ilustrații: 7 b/w illus. 20 tables
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 19 mm
Greutate: 0.51 kg
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Locul publicării:New York, United States

De ce să citești această carte

Recomandăm această lucrare studenților și cercetătorilor în științe politice care doresc să înțeleagă limitele puterii nucleare. Cititorul câștigă o perspectivă demistificată asupra diplomației de coerciție, sprijinită de 20 de tabele statistice și analize istorice clare. Este un instrument esențial pentru a distinge între retorica politică și eficacitatea strategică reală a arsenalelor atomice în conflictele moderne.


Descriere scurtă

Are nuclear weapons useful for coercive diplomacy? Since 1945, most strategic thinking about nuclear weapons has focused on deterrence - using nuclear threats to prevent attacks against the nation's territory and interests. But an often overlooked question is whether nuclear threats can also coerce adversaries to relinquish possessions or change their behavior. Can nuclear weapons be used to blackmail other countries? The prevailing wisdom is that nuclear weapons are useful for coercion, but this book shows that this view is badly misguided. Nuclear weapons are useful mainly for deterrence and self-defense, not for coercion. The authors evaluate the role of nuclear weapons in several foreign policy contexts and present a trove of new quantitative and historical evidence that nuclear weapons do not help countries achieve better results in coercive diplomacy. The evidence is clear: the benefits of possessing nuclear weapons are almost exclusively defensive, not offensive.

Cuprins

Part I. The Logic of Nuclear Skepticism: 1. Nuclear blackmail in international politics; 2. Nuclear coercion and nuclear skepticism; Part II. Trends: 3. Standoffs: nuclear weapons in crisis bargaining; 4. Stalemates: territorial disputes and nuclear politics; Part III. Cases: 5. Brinkmanship busts: when nuclear coercion fails; 6. Think again: reassessing nuclear victories; Part IV. Conclusions: 7. Nuclear coercion in myth and reality.

Recenzii

'This fascinating book is, I believe intentionally, more provocative than merely persuasive, more skeptical than most among us are. It looks at the history of international negotiation, both explicit and by maneuver, in the presence of nuclear weapons and concludes that disparities in nuclear armaments - including zero on one side - make much less difference than they are given credit for. If the argument doesn't persuade you, the forty case studies of nuclear weapons in crisis bargaining (eleven involving the United States) will make you think it over.' Thomas C. Schelling, Winner of the 2005 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences
'Todd S. Sechser and Matthew Fuhrmann make a compelling case that, during the Cold War, nuclear weapons played a critically important role in deterring a nuclear attack on the US; but, importantly, they argue that this was the only role they played. They did not deter the many other security crises we had to deal with, including the Berlin crisis, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War. And they argue that this historical fact has great significance to today's security issues. This book is an important read, not only for its clear articulation of history, but for its relevance to planning nuclear forces or nuclear policy today.' William J. Perry, former United States Secretary of Defense
'This is the most important study on nuclear compellence since Richard Betts published his landmark book in 1987. In fact, Sechser and Fuhrmann have likely written the definitive study on why nuclear compellence has not worked and cannot work.' Robert J. Art, Christian A. Herter Professor of International Relations, Brandeis University,Massachusetts
'Scholars and policymakers have long debated whether obtaining nuclear weapons would allow powerful states to bully or blackmail weaker adversaries, but previous efforts to address this question have lacked both strong logical foundations and systematic empirical evidence. In this rigorous and clearly written study, Todd S. Sechser and Matthew Fuhrmann explain why nuclear superiority confers far less leverage than hardliners typically believe. It is a model of policy-relevant social science that deserves a wide audience.' Stephen M. Walt, Robert and Renee Belfer Professor of International Affairs, Harvard University, Massachusetts
'How do nuclear weapons shape international politics? Does the possession of nuclear weapons provide states with coercive advantages during a crisis? Many scholars and policy makers assume that they do. In their well-researched, crisply argued book, Todd S. Sechser and Matthew Fuhrmann rely on both historical and quantitative approaches to develop their theory of nuclear skepticism. Nuclear weapons, they argue, remain powerful tools for deterrence but contribute little to successful coercive diplomacy. This is an important book: Sechser and Fuhrmann's arguments have potentially significant consequences for both our understanding of nuclear dynamics and the practice of nuclear statecraft, and deserve great attention and debate.' Francis J. Gavin, Frank Stanton Chair in Nuclear Security Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
'A solid and thorough deconstruction and reconstruction of theories about the utility of nuclear threats. Required reading for anyone interested in nuclear diplomacy.' Bruce M. Russett, Dean Acheson Professor of Political Science, Yale University, Connecticut
'Nuclear Weapons and Coercive Diplomacy is well organized and accessible … reads with great relevance to the current international environment.' Catherine Greene, International Studies Review

Descriere

Are nuclear weapons useful for coercive diplomacy? This book argues that they are useful for deterrence but not for offensive purposes.