Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Judicial Activism: Bulwark of Freedom or Precarious Security?

Autor Christopher Wolfe
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 30 apr 1997
In this revised and updated edition of a classic text, one of America's leading constitutional theorists presents a brief but well-balanced history of judicial review and summarizes the arguments both for and against judicial activism within the context of American democracy. Christopher Wolfe demonstrates how modern courts have used their power to create new "rights" with fateful political consequences and he challenges popular opinions held by many contemporary legal scholars. This is important reading for anyone interested in the role of the judiciary within American politics.

Praise for the first edition of Judicial Activism:
"This is a splendid contribution to the literature, integrating for the first time between two covers an extensive debate, honestly and dispassionately presented, on the role of courts in American policy.
-Stanley C. Brubaker, Colgate University
Citește tot Restrânge

Preț: 29667 lei

Preț vechi: 36679 lei
-19%

Puncte Express: 445

Preț estimativ în valută:
5252 6116$ 4563£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 23 februarie-09 martie

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9780847685318
ISBN-10: 0847685314
Pagini: 184
Dimensiuni: 154 x 230 x 8 mm
Greutate: 0.24 kg
Ediția:Revised
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
Locul publicării:New York, United States

Cuprins

Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Framing the Issue
Chapter 3 The Constitution and the Need for Adaptation
Chapter 4 Judicial Review and Democracy
Chapter 5 Judicial Review and Good Government
Chapter 6 Democracy and the Indirect Effects of Judicial Review

Recenzii

A thoughtful and illuminating analysis of one of the most influential policy making institutions in contemporary government. Scrupulously fair in his description of the arguments for and against judicial activism, Wolfe presents the political and constitutional debate over the democratic character of judicial review in rich historical detail.
Professor Wolfe has done something remarkable: put analytical rigor into the concept of judicial activism. The result is an extraordinarily penetrating analysis and critique of the Judiciary's usurpation of democratic authority.
Wolfe offers a lucid summary of the main arguments on judicial activism-both pro and con. He presents an intellectually honest dialectic between the traditional and modern views, stability versus change, legal interpretation versus legislating. Wolfe's book is destined to loom large in constitutional scholarship.