Hybrid Warfare: The Citizens Guide to World War 3
Autor Optimum Publishingen Limba Engleză Carte – 17 oct 2023
Hybrid Warfare and its Characteristics
To put it simply, hybrid warfare entails an interplay or fusion of conventional as well as unconventional instruments of power and tools of subversion. These instruments or tools are blended in a synchronised manner to exploit the vulnerabilities of an antagonist and achieve synergistic effects.
The key pillars of Hybrid War.
- Disinformation and Propoganda
- Government infiltration operations
- Lawfare
- Espionage including, Economic and military IP theft
- Economic warfare (including supply chain domination, hoarding rare earth minerals and the control of organizations that align with the CCP's needs of the future).
- Most insideously the reverse Opium wars that has been yet another genocide of sorts against innocent citizens around the world. Over 150,000 citizens around the world die from pills primarily manufactured in factories in Vancouver, B.C. and Mexico
- Genocide within its own borders
- Transnational Repression
In 2023 we find ourselves with difficult choices as we choose who we will work with and in the future. The Chinese Communist Party has been working to position itself as the globes final arbitor on the rule of law, the definition of human, civil and religious rights and what citizens around the world can expect when they win their war and replace America as the world's predominant global hegemony.
What world leaders and ciizens were led to believe is that by engaging China at all levels and providing them access to our markets, our capital, global institutions and universities that they would bend, alter and change from a repressive Marxist/lenonist regime to a socially progressive naton that embraced many Liberal deomcratic norms, laws and human rights initiatives. As the author wrote in 2021 for Macdonal Laurier's At Issue "And for its part, notwithstanding lazy and half-hearted expressions of “concern” from Ottawa,
Canada has done precious little to defend the basic rights of those living under the CCP’s oppression. So much for the rhetoric of Canada being “back” on the world stage. As China’s supreme leader, Xi Jinping, has stated, “no one is in the position to dictate to the Chinese people what should and should not be done.” Indeed, it seems as though the UN and much of the world has taken this statement as a direct order. Much of the world’s hesitancy to criticize the CCP’s human rights record stems from how the regime has managed to engage in institutional and elite capture. A combination of economic pressure and geostrategic maneuvering has allowed China to control or render meek large swaths of the international system.
The United Front Work Department’s global enterprise of covert and overt influence operations ensures governments continue to be blinded by the PRC’s real ambitions and preventing backlash against them on all matters, including human rights abuses. This is all part of a Xi’s grander strategy, one that envisions a world where human and civil rights and the international rule of law are replaced by a dystopian and dictatorial ethno-nationalist ideology guided by the CCP. We cannot allow China to spread its abuses globally by supporting countries with consistent human rights violations, nor can we allow China to dictate a new world order under their rules.
This book is the first book of its kind and will take concerned citizens through all of the pillars that form the Chinese Communist Party's Hybrid War against all democracies. From the United Front to partnership with the worlds largest heroin and opiod dealers, to organ harvesting and committing genocide at home the corrupt regime under leader Xi Jinping continues its war against us all and yet they have not had to fire a single shot. Author Baxendale has spent the last four years researching and observing the actions of the CCP and has uncovered numerous stories that have made international headlines. From the CCP training soldiers on Canadian soil to the discovery of the "genocide prisons in East Turkestan(Xinjiang) by author Shawn Zhang, Baxendale has had a front row seat on what the CCP is succeeding at as it relates to you and your familie's freedoms.
Preț: 200.90 lei
Puncte Express: 301
Cartea se retipărește
Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:
Se trimite...
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780888903457
ISBN-10: 0888903456
Pagini: 260
Dimensiuni: 140 x 216 x 19 mm
Editura: Optimum Publishing International
Colecția Optimum Publishing International
Locul publicării:Canada
ISBN-10: 0888903456
Pagini: 260
Dimensiuni: 140 x 216 x 19 mm
Editura: Optimum Publishing International
Colecția Optimum Publishing International
Locul publicării:Canada
Recenzii
CNN was cited and here is a report from their website from 2021. It releates to this document provided by the Pentagon. Background: The Emergence of Hybrid Warfare The concept most often called “hybrid warfare”—also called “asymmetric,” “grey zone,” and “unrestricted” warfare—dates back at least twenty years, yet only in recent months is it starting to enter the general lexicon in the United States, even within scholarly circles that are concerned with conflict. However, the U.S. has lagged behind Canada, Australia, and some other Western nations in open discussion of hybrid warfare. The reasons for this lack of attention, and a full discussion of why the topic is significant to negotiation, are beyond the scope of this brief article. We only note here that public concern in the U.S. about hybrid warfare is on the rise, and that just as the Prussian general and military theorist Carl von Clausewitz famously described war as “merely the continuation of policy by other means,”[2] the converse also applies.
In brief, hybrid warfare encapsulates a wide range of tactics in the pursuit of extreme international competition, but outside of traditional military means (Tait 2019). Some of its elements are by now relatively widely known, such as the hacking of critical infrastructure computer systems, or the arrival of “little green men,” who are heavily armed but unidentified, on a disputed border. But other types of attack are much more subtle, including some that have arisen as opportunities only in the wake of the pandemic. For example, on June 16, 2020 CNN reported that the Pentagon had issued warnings that China was engaging in “economic warfare” by targeted purchases of stakes in systemically important U.S. companies that were urgently in need of fresh capital as a result of the pandemic. The warning included the note that some of the companies were so small and so far down a key supply chain that the Pentagon itself might be unaware of their strategic role (Gaouette, Starr, and Salama 2020). For the theory behind hybrid warfare, see Qiao and Wang 1999.[3]
Concern about hybrid warfare in the U.S. Congress has focused on Russian interference with elections, espionage through Chinese technology, and the potential dependence on China for critical supply chains. Since the spread of COVID-19, this last concern has centered on medical supplies such as active ingredients in drugs, protective gear, and vaccines. In other parts of the U.S. government, security professionals are also concerned with Iranian attacks and increasing evidence of collaboration between Iran, Russia, and China.
In brief, hybrid warfare encapsulates a wide range of tactics in the pursuit of extreme international competition, but outside of traditional military means (Tait 2019). Some of its elements are by now relatively widely known, such as the hacking of critical infrastructure computer systems, or the arrival of “little green men,” who are heavily armed but unidentified, on a disputed border. But other types of attack are much more subtle, including some that have arisen as opportunities only in the wake of the pandemic. For example, on June 16, 2020 CNN reported that the Pentagon had issued warnings that China was engaging in “economic warfare” by targeted purchases of stakes in systemically important U.S. companies that were urgently in need of fresh capital as a result of the pandemic. The warning included the note that some of the companies were so small and so far down a key supply chain that the Pentagon itself might be unaware of their strategic role (Gaouette, Starr, and Salama 2020). For the theory behind hybrid warfare, see Qiao and Wang 1999.[3]
Concern about hybrid warfare in the U.S. Congress has focused on Russian interference with elections, espionage through Chinese technology, and the potential dependence on China for critical supply chains. Since the spread of COVID-19, this last concern has centered on medical supplies such as active ingredients in drugs, protective gear, and vaccines. In other parts of the U.S. government, security professionals are also concerned with Iranian attacks and increasing evidence of collaboration between Iran, Russia, and China.