How Bad Writing Destroyed the World: Ayn Rand and the Literary Origins of the Financial Crisis
Autor Adam Weineren Limba Engleză Paperback – 6 oct 2016
A congressional investigation placed the blame for the financial crisis on Alan Greenspan and his deregulatory policies-his attempts, in essence, to put Ayn Rand's Objectivism into practice. Though developed most famously in Rand's Atlas Shrugged, Objectivism sprouted from the Rational Egoism of Nikolai Chernyshevsky's What Is to be Done? (1863), an enormously influential Russian novel decried by the likes of Fyodor Dostoevsky and Vladimir Nabokov for its destructive radical ethics. In tracing the origins of Greenspan's ruinous ideology, How Bad Writing Destroyed the World combines literary and intellectual history to uncover the danger of hawking "the virtues of selfishness," even in fiction.
Preț: 106.43 lei
Preț vechi: 192.16 lei
-45%
Puncte Express: 160
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 12-26 iunie
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781501313110
ISBN-10: 1501313118
Pagini: 264
Dimensiuni: 128 x 196 x 22 mm
Greutate: 0.3 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Locul publicării:New York, United States
ISBN-10: 1501313118
Pagini: 264
Dimensiuni: 128 x 196 x 22 mm
Greutate: 0.3 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția Bloomsbury Academic
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Cuprins
Acknowledgments
Introduction: On the Dubious Virtue of Selfishness
Chapter One: Radicalizing Dostoevsky
Chapter Two: "The Most Atrocious Work of Russian Literature"
Chapter Three: Dostoevsky Reborn
Chapter Four: Rigor "Mortus" or Waiting for Rakhmetov
Chapter Five: Fire in the Minds of Men
Chapter Six: Rakhmetov Lives!
Chapter Seven: The Vengeance of the Muse
Chapter Eight: In the Graveyard of Bad Ideas
Notes
Works Cited
Index
Introduction: On the Dubious Virtue of Selfishness
Chapter One: Radicalizing Dostoevsky
Chapter Two: "The Most Atrocious Work of Russian Literature"
Chapter Three: Dostoevsky Reborn
Chapter Four: Rigor "Mortus" or Waiting for Rakhmetov
Chapter Five: Fire in the Minds of Men
Chapter Six: Rakhmetov Lives!
Chapter Seven: The Vengeance of the Muse
Chapter Eight: In the Graveyard of Bad Ideas
Notes
Works Cited
Index
Recenzii
Weiner's is an intellectual history told as a horror story. The history is a deliberately ironic one: how "rational egoism," the doctrine of Nikolai Chernyshevsky's 1863 novel/manifesto "What Is to Be Done?," which was the inspiration for Russian revolutionaries from Bakunin to Lenin, migrated to the United States in the guise of Ayn Rand's far-right objectivism. . Weiner rises to the challenge of paraphrasing Chernyshevsky and Rand and illustrating the clumsiness and incoherence of their books.
Weiner's literary criticism, focusing on political and philosophical themes, is solid up to and including his explication of Rand's Atlas Shrugged, written by a woman who, Weiner reminds us, grew up in St. Petersburg at a time when Chernyshevsky's influence there was 'ubiquitous and unassailable.' Weiner's conclusion that 'unfettered capitalism is no more a utopia than the chained collective' effectively damns both Chernyshevsky and Rand in one sentence.
[Shows that] appalling fiction by an appalling woman is not only a reliable shelf-scanning test when sizing up dates for arrogance or stupidity, but literally toxic. Weiner's pugnacious look at the bad, bad, morally and stylistically bad books of Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum pans back to show us Alan Greenspan and the crash on one end of a comedy of horrors, and a key Rand influence, Nikolai Chernyshevsky, on the other, via Nabokov and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. You've got to love a scholar who starts with 'On the Dubious Virtues of Selfishness' - and ends with 'In the Graveyard of Bad Ideas', a closing shot of Atlas Shrugged's chain-smoking ghouls, a crack about lung cancer and the words 'The vulture will always come home to roost.'
Weiner's book succeeds in offering an entertaining, if sensationalist, introduction to the politics of literary radicalism for a non-academic audience.
An enormously helpful study ... This book is essential reading for understanding the growth of Russian literature in its golden period during the nineteenth century - and for exposing the surprising origin and unsuspected genesis to the ideology behind Greenspan and Trump.
Weiner's key insight is connecting Rand's ideas - and the Russian literary intellectual lineage she emerged from - with the 2008 financial collapse ... Most historical changes have some kind of intellectual root, for better and worse; kudos to Weiner for tracing how a series of bad ideas and clumsy prose led the nation to the Great Recession. But Weiner, a scholar of Russian literature, appears to be far more interested in one of Rand's antecedents than Rand herself. Nikolai Chernyshevsky, the revolutionary socialist best known for his 1863 novel What Is To Be Done?, written while its author was imprisoned in a St. Petersburg fortress, is his true subject ... Weiner deftly handle[s] the contradiction here: a bad novel could not only become ideologically potent, but it could also inspire people who would not recognize each other as fellow travelers.
Weiner's literary criticism, focusing on political and philosophical themes, is solid up to and including his explication of Rand's Atlas Shrugged, written by a woman who, Weiner reminds us, grew up in St. Petersburg at a time when Chernyshevsky's influence there was 'ubiquitous and unassailable.' Weiner's conclusion that 'unfettered capitalism is no more a utopia than the chained collective' effectively damns both Chernyshevsky and Rand in one sentence.
[Shows that] appalling fiction by an appalling woman is not only a reliable shelf-scanning test when sizing up dates for arrogance or stupidity, but literally toxic. Weiner's pugnacious look at the bad, bad, morally and stylistically bad books of Alisa Zinov'yevna Rosenbaum pans back to show us Alan Greenspan and the crash on one end of a comedy of horrors, and a key Rand influence, Nikolai Chernyshevsky, on the other, via Nabokov and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. You've got to love a scholar who starts with 'On the Dubious Virtues of Selfishness' - and ends with 'In the Graveyard of Bad Ideas', a closing shot of Atlas Shrugged's chain-smoking ghouls, a crack about lung cancer and the words 'The vulture will always come home to roost.'
Weiner's book succeeds in offering an entertaining, if sensationalist, introduction to the politics of literary radicalism for a non-academic audience.
An enormously helpful study ... This book is essential reading for understanding the growth of Russian literature in its golden period during the nineteenth century - and for exposing the surprising origin and unsuspected genesis to the ideology behind Greenspan and Trump.
Weiner's key insight is connecting Rand's ideas - and the Russian literary intellectual lineage she emerged from - with the 2008 financial collapse ... Most historical changes have some kind of intellectual root, for better and worse; kudos to Weiner for tracing how a series of bad ideas and clumsy prose led the nation to the Great Recession. But Weiner, a scholar of Russian literature, appears to be far more interested in one of Rand's antecedents than Rand herself. Nikolai Chernyshevsky, the revolutionary socialist best known for his 1863 novel What Is To Be Done?, written while its author was imprisoned in a St. Petersburg fortress, is his true subject ... Weiner deftly handle[s] the contradiction here: a bad novel could not only become ideologically potent, but it could also inspire people who would not recognize each other as fellow travelers.