Globalization and Armed Conflict
en Limba Engleză Paperback – 10 iun 2003
Preț: 453.17 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 680
Preț estimativ în valută:
80.18€ • 93.41$ • 70.02£
80.18€ • 93.41$ • 70.02£
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 19 ianuarie-02 februarie 26
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780742518322
ISBN-10: 0742518329
Pagini: 384
Dimensiuni: 162 x 227 x 21 mm
Greutate: 0.49 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Rowman & Littlefield
ISBN-10: 0742518329
Pagini: 384
Dimensiuni: 162 x 227 x 21 mm
Greutate: 0.49 kg
Ediția:New.
Editura: Rowman & Littlefield
Cuprins
Part 1 I Competing Models of the Peace-Through-Globalization Hypothesis Chapter 2 Does Globalization Contribute to Peace? A Critical Survey of the Literature Chapter 3 Multilateral Interactions in the Trade-Conflict Model Chapter 4 When Do 'Relative Gains' Impede Trade? Chapter 5 Extending the Multi-Country Model of Trade and Conflict Chapter 6 The Domestic Roots of Commercial Liberalism: A Sector-Specific Approach Chapter 7 How Globalization Can Reduce International Conflict Part 8 II Empirical Contributions Chapter 9 Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict Chapter 10 Modeling Dynamics in the Study of Conflict: A Comment on Oneal and Russett Chapter 11 Modeling Conflict While Studying Dynamics: A Response to Nathaniel Beck Chapter 12 The Trade and Conflict Debate: Exploring the Frontier Chapter 13 Development and the Liberal Peace: What Does it Take to be a Trading State? Chapter 14 Institutions, Interdependence, and International Conflict Chapter 15 Globalization and Internal Conflict Chapter 16 The Trade-Disruption Hypothesis and the Liberal Economic Theory of Peace Chapter 17 Does War Disrupt Trade? Chapter 18 Globalization: Creative Destruction and the Prospect of a Capitalist Peace
Notă biografică
Descriere
This work asks "Does global economic integration foster or suppress violent disputes within and between states? It shows that expanding commercial ties between states pacifies some, but not necessarily all, political relationships. It shows how important the fragile "capitalist peace" is.