Ever Not Quite
Autor Saulo De Freitas Araujo, Lisa M Osbecken Limba Engleză Paperback – 4 sep 2025
| Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
|---|---|---|
| Paperback (1) | 247.52 lei 3-5 săpt. | +11.14 lei 4-10 zile |
| Cambridge University Press – 4 sep 2025 | 247.52 lei 3-5 săpt. | +11.14 lei 4-10 zile |
| Hardback (1) | 667.65 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
| Cambridge University Press – 29 iun 2023 | 667.65 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 247.52 lei
Puncte Express: 371
Preț estimativ în valută:
43.81€ • 50.89$ • 37.96£
43.81€ • 50.89$ • 37.96£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 09-23 februarie
Livrare express 23-29 ianuarie pentru 21.13 lei
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781009704731
ISBN-10: 1009704737
Pagini: 195
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 11 mm
Greutate: 0.27 kg
Editura: Cambridge University Press
ISBN-10: 1009704737
Pagini: 195
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 11 mm
Greutate: 0.27 kg
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Cuprins
1. The problem of pluralism(s); 2. Pluralism(s) in contemporary psychology; 3. 'Pluralism' and related terms in the broader context of James's life and writing; 4. A systematic analysis of James's pluralism(s); 5. Implications of pluralism for contemporary psychology; 6. Concluding remarks.
Recenzii
'This book presents abundant evidence for the pluralism in William James's understanding of the human thought and action. It documents James's close reading of psychological and philosophical research and theorizing and shows that he intuited the directions of later psychological science. Holding this book's insights alongside the work of contemporary psychology offers potential to 'stretch the boundaries of psychological science.' For James's deliberate explorations, Araujo and Osbeck are sure-footed and intelligent guides.' Paul Croce, Stetson University
'This book gives a lucid overview of the pluralistic position(s) articulated by William James and teases out insights we might glean from James for contemporary discussions about pluralism in psychology. The authors reconstruct how James's views about pluralism evolved over time and take a broad view of how they fit within (but are not reducible to) other well-known aspects of James intellectual project. An important contribution to the James scholarship, opening up exciting new avenues for future research in theoretical psychology.' Uljana Feest, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany
'Araujo and Osbeck's volume marks the most thorough examination to date of the nature and implications of the many uses of 'pluralism' in contemporary psychology. The authors stimulate reflection on these uses in relation to a broad range of William James's scholarly productions and correspondence, a formidable task to which the authors bring nuance, humility, and insightfulness.' Kevin P. Weinfurt, Duke University
'Saulo Araujo and Lisa Osbeck have written a scholarly masterpiece that takes the pluralistic bull by its historical, disciplinary, and conceptual-analytic horns, shedding much-needed light on a much-used concept. In demonstrating how various contemporary positions on pluralism reflect and depart from James's views, the authors open 'new paths for encouraging psychologists to reflect on James's pluralistic philosophy.' Ever Not Quite is sure to inspire new ways to tackle psychology's age-old problems – be they metatheoretical, theoretical, methodological, or practical. I predict it will become a classic in our time and beyond.' Barbara S. Held, Bowdoin College, USA
'This book gives a lucid overview of the pluralistic position(s) articulated by William James and teases out insights we might glean from James for contemporary discussions about pluralism in psychology. The authors reconstruct how James's views about pluralism evolved over time and take a broad view of how they fit within (but are not reducible to) other well-known aspects of James intellectual project. An important contribution to the James scholarship, opening up exciting new avenues for future research in theoretical psychology.' Uljana Feest, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany
'Araujo and Osbeck's volume marks the most thorough examination to date of the nature and implications of the many uses of 'pluralism' in contemporary psychology. The authors stimulate reflection on these uses in relation to a broad range of William James's scholarly productions and correspondence, a formidable task to which the authors bring nuance, humility, and insightfulness.' Kevin P. Weinfurt, Duke University
'Saulo Araujo and Lisa Osbeck have written a scholarly masterpiece that takes the pluralistic bull by its historical, disciplinary, and conceptual-analytic horns, shedding much-needed light on a much-used concept. In demonstrating how various contemporary positions on pluralism reflect and depart from James's views, the authors open 'new paths for encouraging psychologists to reflect on James's pluralistic philosophy.' Ever Not Quite is sure to inspire new ways to tackle psychology's age-old problems – be they metatheoretical, theoretical, methodological, or practical. I predict it will become a classic in our time and beyond.' Barbara S. Held, Bowdoin College, USA