Correlations Between the Physical and Social Sciences
Autor Valentine J. Belfiglioen Limba Engleză Paperback – 23 noi 2011
Preț: 213.76 lei
Preț vechi: 304.75 lei
-30%
Puncte Express: 321
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 22 septembrie-06 octombrie
Livrare prin curier în România Termenul estimat este afișat lângă disponibilitate.
Transport gratuit de la 400.00 lei Plată online sau ramburs, în funcție de opțiunile comenzii.
Retur gratuit în 14 zile Comandă securizată și suport în română.
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780761855897
ISBN-10: 0761855890
Pagini: 76
Dimensiuni: 156 x 228 x 5 mm
Greutate: 0.1 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția University Press of America
Locul publicării:New York, United States
ISBN-10: 0761855890
Pagini: 76
Dimensiuni: 156 x 228 x 5 mm
Greutate: 0.1 kg
Editura: Bloomsbury Publishing
Colecția University Press of America
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Cuprins
Dedication
Acknowledgment
Introduction
Chapter I:
Exogamous and Endogamous Marriages Among Italians and Mexicans in Dallas County, Texas (2000)
Chapter II:
The Mirror Image: A Correlation between the Physical and Social Sciences
Chapter III:
Major American Military conflicts and the Formulae for
Empirical and Subjective Probabilities
Chapter IV:
Radioactive Decay and the Rate of Decline of Empires
Conclusion
Appendix
Acknowledgment
Introduction
Chapter I:
Exogamous and Endogamous Marriages Among Italians and Mexicans in Dallas County, Texas (2000)
Chapter II:
The Mirror Image: A Correlation between the Physical and Social Sciences
Chapter III:
Major American Military conflicts and the Formulae for
Empirical and Subjective Probabilities
Chapter IV:
Radioactive Decay and the Rate of Decline of Empires
Conclusion
Appendix
Recenzii
Correlations Between the Physical and Social Sciences by Valentine J. Belfiglio presents four case studies that make correlations between the physical and social sciences, stressing it is important to anchor statistical data to mathematical formulae or the laws of physics to minimize the conscious and unconscious bias of some scholars who might otherwise manipulate data in support of preconceived notions.