Conflict between Equals: Tort Law beyond Wrong, Harm, and Cost: Oxford Private Law Theory
Autor Avihay Dorfmanen Limba Engleză Hardback – 30 apr 2026
Preț: 806.81 lei
Preț vechi: 1209.03 lei
-33% Precomandă
Puncte Express: 1210
Carte nepublicată încă
Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:
Se trimite...
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780198979876
ISBN-10: 0198979878
Pagini: 432
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Editura: OUP OXFORD
Colecția OUP Oxford
Seria Oxford Private Law Theory
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
ISBN-10: 0198979878
Pagini: 432
Dimensiuni: 156 x 234 mm
Editura: OUP OXFORD
Colecția OUP Oxford
Seria Oxford Private Law Theory
Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom
Recenzii
Avihay Dorfman has written a masterpiece. Conflict between Equals fundamentally reframes the field of tort theory, moving sophisticatedly beyond the traditional concepts of "wrongs", "recourse" and "cost-internalization". By insisting that the law must construct, not merely correct, human interaction, Dorfman vindicates tort law as a constitutive institution of a liberal society. With philosophical rigor and doctrinal sensitivity, he offers a profound vision of how private persons can relate as substantive equals. This transformative work that will shape the conversation for decades to come, is essential reading for legal scholars, philosophers, students, and practitioners.
In a series of sophisticated articles published over the last fifteen years, Avihay Dorfman has developed the view that tort law expresses a substantive and liberal conception of relational equality. In his sustained elaboration of this view in his new book, Conflict of Equals, Dorfman ambitiously attempts to disclose how (as he puts it) "tort law constructs the normative universe we inhabit in our daily lives." Both for those who are sympathetic to his approach and for those who are not, this engaging and expansive book will consolidate Dorfman's position in the forefront of contemporary tort theory.
The field of tort law has been waiting for this book. Conflict Between Equals manages to take central insights from decades of tort law scholarship and synthesize them into a single account that also introduces a novel overarching understanding of why tort law continues to matter. By placing conflict at the heart of tort theory, Dorfman reveals the positive role that tort law plays in structuring human interactions precisely because the field is forced to make substantive choices between competing priorities. Dorfman also gives due regard to tort law's commitment to relational equality that is necessary for any ongoing conflict resolution mechanism to maintain legitimacy within a private law system. In short, all of tort law is in this book, and all who care about the field should read it.
Conflict between Equals is at once lucid and accessible, and deep and provocative. It steps back from debates about costs, wrongs, and harms to ask why we have tort law at all. Dorfman's answer is twofold. First, we have tort law to address conflicts among persons and their interests. Second, tort's private law structure imposes a form on tort law's function. That form expresses a powerful idea of relational equality. Dorfman brings these two theories into dialog with one another, leading its readers to be continuously aware that tort law's doctrine, structure, and function are bursting with latent value commitments. The result is a book that is alive with insight and thought and which awakens thought. It should stir us all to rethink matters previously regarded as settled and to change the way we think about the subject.
In a series of sophisticated articles published over the last fifteen years, Avihay Dorfman has developed the view that tort law expresses a substantive and liberal conception of relational equality. In his sustained elaboration of this view in his new book, Conflict of Equals, Dorfman ambitiously attempts to disclose how (as he puts it) "tort law constructs the normative universe we inhabit in our daily lives." Both for those who are sympathetic to his approach and for those who are not, this engaging and expansive book will consolidate Dorfman's position in the forefront of contemporary tort theory.
The field of tort law has been waiting for this book. Conflict Between Equals manages to take central insights from decades of tort law scholarship and synthesize them into a single account that also introduces a novel overarching understanding of why tort law continues to matter. By placing conflict at the heart of tort theory, Dorfman reveals the positive role that tort law plays in structuring human interactions precisely because the field is forced to make substantive choices between competing priorities. Dorfman also gives due regard to tort law's commitment to relational equality that is necessary for any ongoing conflict resolution mechanism to maintain legitimacy within a private law system. In short, all of tort law is in this book, and all who care about the field should read it.
Conflict between Equals is at once lucid and accessible, and deep and provocative. It steps back from debates about costs, wrongs, and harms to ask why we have tort law at all. Dorfman's answer is twofold. First, we have tort law to address conflicts among persons and their interests. Second, tort's private law structure imposes a form on tort law's function. That form expresses a powerful idea of relational equality. Dorfman brings these two theories into dialog with one another, leading its readers to be continuously aware that tort law's doctrine, structure, and function are bursting with latent value commitments. The result is a book that is alive with insight and thought and which awakens thought. It should stir us all to rethink matters previously regarded as settled and to change the way we think about the subject.
Notă biografică
Avihay Dorfman is "The Friends of Joe Jamail" Regents Chair in Law and Founding Academic Director of the Private Law Theory Program at the University of Texas at Austin. His work focuses on the conceptual and normative foundations of law. He has written on fundamental questions in private law theory and doctrine, as well as on the morality of public ordering. His research on the latter includes investigations into why privatization may sometimes be impermissible and what might make political authority legitimate. Across these areas, Dorfman emphasizes the non-instrumental values that underpin key legal and political institutions. His work explores the non-contingent implications of the law for enabling valuable forms of interaction between-and among-individuals.