Humanity is not a player on the Climate Change front. All Climate Change Actions are cosmic in origin. We can't affect the climate. I wish we could. It would enable us to avoid the next Ice Age. But we can't. We can only respond to the big and small climate changes that the cosmic dynamics impose. We are out of our league in the climate arena. And what we call climate science is clogged up with mysticism, such as Manmade Global Warming caused by CO2 emissions. Manmade Global Warming is scientifically impossible, except in dreams. CO2 is not a climate factor. The big climate factor is cloudiness, which is controlled by changing solar cosmic-ray flux that reflects changing solar activity. And all of that is caused by the ever-changing cosmic dynamics that affect our Sun, which we have concrete measured evidence for in corresponding Carbon-14 ratios. Ice Ages result when thresholds are crossed in cosmic dynamics. We see evidence for that in diminishing solar wind and diminishing magnetic fields. The CO2 greenhouse effect is too minuscule to affect anything in comparison with the big Cosmic climate forcing. The CO2 Climate Change fears are based on illusions and lies, no matter how firmly the entire world believes the illusions and lies. Science needs to be rescued from the manmade climate-change trap, for the liberation of humanity from the consequences of the illusions and lies. Numerous fields of evidence tell us that the next Ice Age is near. That's where the truth begins. Most of the evidence was discovered in the 1990s and thereafter. Some evidence is measured in ice cores; some is measured in space, by satellites. Some measurements are also made on the ground in terms of measurements of the Earth's magnetic-pole drift observed in northern Canada. All of this is seen combined with high-energy physics experiments at a leading national laboratory, and is also explored in the small in static experiments. Against the background of these widely diverse types of evidence that have been recently discovered, the historic Little Ice Age in the 1600s, takes on a new dimension as a yardstick for measuring the future that by this evidence promises to be up to 40-times colder than the Little Ice Age had been. It qualifies for the term, Absolute The evidence poses a great challenge ahead. Are we ready to respond? The Ice Age phase shift in climate is a stark in differences as night and day, and similarly fast. In the Little Ice Age between 10% and up to 30% of the populations in Europe had perished by starvation. The last Big Ice Age was evidently vastly harsher. Only 1-10 million people emerged from it alive. That's all we had after 2 million years of development. We want to do far better this time around; and we can, with large-scale technological infrastructures for our food supply. But will we create them? Will we get the job done in the 30 years that we still have left before the Ice Age starts anew? Will we even consider it? And how certain are we that the phase shift to the next glaciation period will begin, as the evidence suggests, in the 2050s? We have no slack on this front. By failing itself on this absolute front, humanity actively commits suicide. So, what will the answer be? Will we move with the evidence? Or will we lay ourselves down to die by default? It takes an independent researcher to brake the taboos that have kept mainstream cosmology imprisoned, increasingly, during the past century, even while what is regarded as taboo is known to be wrong.