Arguments and Reason-Giving
Autor Matthew W. McKeonen Limba Engleză Hardback – 29 aug 2024
Preț: 535.36 lei
Preț vechi: 789.82 lei
-32%
Puncte Express: 803
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 08-14 octombrie
Livrare prin curier în România Termenul estimat este afișat lângă disponibilitate.
Transport gratuit pentru acest produs Plată online sau ramburs, în funcție de opțiunile comenzii.
Retur gratuit în 14 zile Comandă securizată și suport în română.
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9780197751633
ISBN-10: 0197751636
Pagini: 368
Dimensiuni: 152 x 224 x 33 mm
Greutate: 0.66 kg
Editura: Oxford University Press
Colecția OUP USA
Locul publicării:New York, United States
ISBN-10: 0197751636
Pagini: 368
Dimensiuni: 152 x 224 x 33 mm
Greutate: 0.66 kg
Editura: Oxford University Press
Colecția OUP USA
Locul publicării:New York, United States
Recenzii
McKeon conceives of an argument as being something that can be used as an inferential statement and is the type of reason-giving argument often depicted in argumentation and informal logic literature. He views such an argument as a rationally intentional argument, which offers premises providing reasons for believing its conclusion is true.
Notă biografică
Matthew W. McKeon is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Michigan State University where he has been Chair of the Department of Philosophy since 2011.
Cuprins
- Chapter 1: Introduction
- Part I: Arguments, Inference Claims, and Reflective Inference
- Chapter 2: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments
- 2.1 Preamble
- 2.2 Arguing and arguments
- 2.3 Arguments in informal logic, argumentation studies, and formal logic
- 2.3.1 Arguments in informal logic
- 2.3.2 Argumentation studies
- 2.3.3 Arguments in formal logic
- 2.4 Reason-giving uses of arguments
- 2.5 Conclusion
- Chapter 3: Inference Claims
- 3.1 Preamble
- 3.2 Argument claims and uses of arguments
- 3.3 The connection between inference claims and reason-giving uses of argument
- 3.3.1 Inference claim and reasons for believing
- 3.3.2 Dialectical arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
- 3.4 How, exactly, are inference claims conveyed by one's statement of an argument?
- 3.4.1 Mere implication
- 3.4.2 Conversational implicature
- 3.4.3 Conventional implicature
- 3.4.4 Assertion
- 3.5 Conclusion
- Chapter 4: Reflective Inference
- 4.1 Preamble
- 4.2 Critical Thinking
- 4.2.1 Baseline characterizations of critical thinking
- 4.2.2 Inference and critical thinking
- 4.3 Reflective inferences and reason-giving uses of arguments
- 4.4 Conclusion
- Part II: Formal Validity, Rational Persuasion, Argumentative Rationality, Intellectual Honest and Intellectual Integrity
- Chapter 5: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments, Formally Valid Arguments, and Demonstrative Arguments
- 5.1 Preamble
- 5.2 Deductive arguments, demonstrative arguments, and reflective inferences
- 5.3 Formally valid arguments and demonstrative arguments
- 5.4 Formally valid arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
- 5.5 Demonstrative arguments and reason-giving uses of arguments
- 5.6 Conclusion
- Chapter 6: Reason-Giving Uses of Argument, Invitations to Inference, and Rational Persuasion
- 6.1 Preamble
- 6.2 Invitations to inference are reason-giving uses of arguments
- 6.3 Invitations to inference invite only the inferences expressed by the arguments used
- 6.4 Indirect persuasion
- 6.5 Conclusion
- Chapter 7: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments and Argumentative Rationality
- 7.1 Preamble
- 7.2 Reason for belief and the rationality of belief
- 7.3 The Pragma-epistemic approach to argumentative rationality
- 7.4. The epistemic and pragma-dialectic approaches to argumentative rationality
- 7.4.1 The objective epistemic approach to argumentative rationality
- 7.4.2 The Pragma-dialectic approach to argumentative rationality
- 7.5 Argumentative rationality and good argumentation
- 7.6 Conclusion
- Chapter 8: Reason-Giving Uses of Arguments, Intellectual Honesty, and Intellectual integrity
- 8.1 Preamble
- 8.2 Intellectual honesty and truthfulness
- 8.3 Reason-giving uses of arguments and intellectual honesty
- 8.4 Reason-giving uses of arguments and intellectual integrity
- 8.5 Conclusion
- Index