Argument Structure:
Autor James B Freemanen Limba Engleză Hardback – 11 mar 2011
Preț: 620.90 lei
Preț vechi: 730.47 lei
-15%
Puncte Express: 931
Carte tipărită la comandă
Livrare economică 23 mai-06 iunie
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9789400703568
ISBN-10: 9400703562
Pagini: 214
Ilustrații: XVIII, 214 p.
Dimensiuni: 164 x 242 x 25 mm
Greutate: 0.5 kg
Ediția:2011 edition
Editura: Springer
Locul publicării:Dordrecht, Netherlands
ISBN-10: 9400703562
Pagini: 214
Ilustrații: XVIII, 214 p.
Dimensiuni: 164 x 242 x 25 mm
Greutate: 0.5 kg
Ediția:2011 edition
Editura: Springer
Locul publicării:Dordrecht, Netherlands
Public țintă
ResearchCuprins
Preface.- Chapter One An Approach to Argument Macrostructure.- Chapter Two The Dialectical Nature of ARGUMENT.- Chapter Three Toulmin’s Problematic Notion of Warrant.- Chapter Four The Linked-Convergent Distinction–A First Approximation.- Chapter Five Argument Structure and Disciplinary Perspective: The Linked-Convergent versus Multiple-Co-ordinatively Compound Distinctions.- Chapter Six The Linked-Convergent Distinction–Refining the Criterion.- Chapter Seven Argument Structure and Enthymemes.- Chapter Eight From Analysis to Evaluation.-References.- Index.
Textul de pe ultima copertă
This monograph presents a method of diagramming argument macrostructure, synthesizing the standard circle and arrow approach with the Toulmin model. A theoretical justification of this method through a dialectical understanding of argument, a critical examination of Toulmin on warrants, and a thorough discussion of the linked-convergent distinction follows. Discussion includes consideration of alternative understandings of argument structure and its representation presented in Wigmore’s chart method, Pollock’s inference graphs, and the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation. An account of the proper reconstruction of enthymemes and issues at the border of structural analysis versus evaluation of arguments conclude the book.
Caracteristici
Comprehensive dialectical theory representing argument structures incorporating Toulmin model insights Defends the linked-convergent distinction in depth, responding to virtually all recent critics in journals and proceedings