Cantitate/Preț
Produs

The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction <i>ratione materiae</i> of Investment Treaty Tribunals: The Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory?: Nijhoff International Investment Law Series, cartea 20

Autor Reza Eftekhar
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 7 oct 2021
The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals: The Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory? focuses on the largely unexplored role of the host state law in determining the jurisdiction ratione materiae of investment treaty tribunals. Given domestic law’s essential role in subject-matter jurisdiction issues, and in the light of the broader function of host state law and host state courts in contemporary investment treaty law, the author argues that the dormant “localisation” theory that was raised and defended by developing countries in the 1960s-1970s in the context of foreign investment contract disputes has now been partially revived in the area of the investment treaty law. This is a significant milestone in the ongoing discussions on the reform of the investment treaty dispute settlement regime.
Citește tot Restrânge

Din seria Nijhoff International Investment Law Series

Preț: 75753 lei

Preț vechi: 92382 lei
-18%

Puncte Express: 1136

Preț estimativ în valută:
14513 15721$ 12446£

Carte indisponibilă temporar

Doresc să fiu notificat când acest titlu va fi disponibil:

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9789004469594
ISBN-10: 9004469591
Dimensiuni: 155 x 235 mm
Greutate: 0 kg
Editura: Brill
Colecția Brill | Nijhoff
Seria Nijhoff International Investment Law Series


Cuprins

Acknowledgments
List of Abbreviations

Introduction
I The Relevance of the Host State Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations: Revival of the Localisation Theory?
II Questions and Arguments
III Structure
IV Essential Concepts
AApplicable Law
BDomestic Law
V Approach and Sources
AGeneral Approach
BInterpretive Approach
CSources

PART 1
The Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of An Investment Treaty Tribunal

1 The Role of Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations in General
Introduction
Section One: General Remarks with Regard to the Application of Domestic Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations
AThe Reason for the Importance of Host State Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations
BThe Guise in Which Domestic Law Applies in Investment Treaty Arbitrations: As Fact or as Law?
CThe Legal Grounds of the Application of Domestic Law as Law in Investment Treaty Arbitrations
A The Parties Have Expressly or Impliedly Chosen Domestic Law to Govern a Particular Issue
B The Nature of the Legal Issue
DThe Irrelevance of the Applicable Law Provision in Investment Treaties and the ICSID Convention

Section Two: The Situations in Which an Investment Treaty Tribunal Has to Refer to Domestic Laws
AThe Role of Domestic Law in Jurisdictional Issues
A Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae
I The Legality of Investment
II Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment
III Approval of Investments
BRatione Personae
BThe Role of Domestic Law in Issues Concerning Merits
A Domestic Law as Fact in Issues Concerning Merits
B Domestic Law as Law in Issues Concerning Merits
I Express Treaty Reference to the Application of Domestic Law as Law
II Contractual Claims
Section Three: Ascertaining the Contents of the Host State Law: Methods and Means
AAscertaining the Contents of the Host State Law: Methods
BAscertaining the Contents of the Host State Law: Means
CConclusion on the Methods and Means of Ascertaining the Contents of the Host State Law
Conclusion

Introduction to Chapters 2 & 3: The Role of Domestic Law in Determining the Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae of Investment Treaty Tribunals

2 Application of Domestic Law to the Legality Requirement
Section One: The Legal Bases for Referring to the Laws of the Host State
AAgreement by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty
A Express Agreement of the Treaty Contracting Parties
I Varying Formulations and Its Impact
II Varying Locations and Its Impact
B Implicit Reference
BThe Nature of the Legal Issue
CRelying on Principles of International Law for Dismissing Illegal Investments
Section Two: The Actual Application of Domestic Law to Particular Questions Regarding the Legality Requirement
AThe Scope of the Legality Requirement
A The Formal Scope of the Legality Requirement
B The Substantive Scope of the Legality Requirement
I Approaches Adopted in Investment Treaty Arbitrations
II The Proposed Solution Regarding the Substantive Scope of the Legality Requirement
C Temporal Scope of the Legality Requirement
D Conclusions on the Scope of the Legality Requirement
BThe Consequences of the Application of the Legality Requirement
A General and Specific Consequences of the Legality Requirement
I General Consequence of Illegality
II Specific Consequence of Illegality
III The Missing Jurisdictional Condition
B Possible Defences by Investors
I Object and Purpose of the Underlying Investment Treaty
II The Involvement of the Host State
Conclusion

3 Application of Domestic Law to Questions Regarding the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment
Introduction
Section One: The Applicable Law to the Question of Determining the Meaning, Scope, and the Legal Bearings of Rights over Property Constituting Investment
AAgreement by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty
I Express Choice by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty
II Implied Choice by the Contracting Parties in the Underlying Investment Treaty
BThe Nature of the Legal Issue
CConclusion
Section Two: The Actual Application of Domestic Law to Particular Questions Regarding the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment
AThe General Function of Host State Law in Determining the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment
BThe Specific Function of Host State Law in Determining the Existence of Rights over Property Constituting Investment
A Definition of Property
B Conditions for Transfer of Title
C Conditions for Protection of Contractual Rights
Conclusion

PART 2
The Revival of the Localisation Theory in Light of the Developments in Investment Treaty Law

4 The Localisation Theory
Roots, Premises, and Its Legal Destiny
Introduction
Section One: Classic State-Centric Theories: The Calvo Doctrine and the Localisation Theory
Section Two: The Emergence of Bilateral Investment Treaties
Conclusion

5 Partial Revival of the Localisation Theory in the Field of Investment Treaty Arbitration: The Current Role of Host State Law and Host State Court
Introduction
Section One: The Current Role of Host State Law
AA Distillation of Chapters 1–3 regarding the Role of the Domestic Law of the Host State in Determining the Jurisdiction ratione materiae of An Investment Treaty Tribunal
BDevelopments in Investment Treaty Law Regarding the Role of Host State Law in the Resolution of Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases
ADevelopments in Investment Treaty Rulemaking Regarding the Role of Host State Law in the Resolution of Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases
I Shift in the Approach towards the Role of the Host State Law in the Indian Model Investment Treaties
II Shift in the Approach towards the Role of the Host State Law in the Dutch Model Investment Treaties
ADevelopments in Investment Treaty Jurisprudence Regarding the Role of Host State Law in the Resolution of Investment Treaty Arbitration Cases
Conclusion
Section Two: The Current Role of Host State Courts
ARecourse to Local Remedies for A Defined Period As A Precondition of Filing the Case before International Investment Arbitration
BRecourse to Host State Court As A Prerequisite of the Establishment of the Violation of Investment Treaty Standards
CRecourse to Host State Court’s Determinations As A Point of Reference for Clarifying Preliminary Points of the Domestic Law
A The Interplay between Investment Treaty Tribunal and Host State Court in Substantive Matters
B Jurisprudence of International Courts and Tribunals with Regard to the Weight and Value of Host State Court’s Determinations in International Proceedings
C Concerns over the Legitimacy of Host State Court’s Determinations
D Proposed Solutions to the Legitimacy Concerns
DRecourse to Host State Court As An Investment Dispute Settlement Venue
A Host State Court as the Sole Venue for the Final Resolution of All Investment Treaty Disputes upon the Irreversible Choice by the Investor: Fork-in-the-Road Clauses
B Host State Court as an Alternative Venue for the Final Resolution of All Investment Treaty Disputes
C Host State Court as the Sole Venue for the Final Resolution of All Investment Treaty Disputes
D Host State Court as the Sole Venue for the Final Resolution of Certain Investment Disputes
Conclusion

Final Conclusion

Sources
Index


Notă biografică

Reza Eftekhar, Ph.D. (2019), Leiden University, is a Legal Adviser at the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. He has published translations and co-authored articles and book chapters on international arbitration and investment treaty arbitration.