Inconsistency in Linguistic Theorising
Autor András Kertész, Csilla Rákosien Limba Engleză Paperback – 20 mar 2025
| Toate formatele și edițiile | Preț | Express |
|---|---|---|
| Paperback (1) | 209.50 lei 3-5 săpt. | +20.56 lei 4-10 zile |
| Cambridge University Press – 20 mar 2025 | 209.50 lei 3-5 săpt. | +20.56 lei 4-10 zile |
| Hardback (1) | 654.93 lei 6-8 săpt. | |
| Cambridge University Press – 6 iul 2022 | 654.93 lei 6-8 săpt. |
Preț: 209.50 lei
Nou
Puncte Express: 314
Preț estimativ în valută:
37.07€ • 43.18$ • 32.37£
37.07€ • 43.18$ • 32.37£
Carte disponibilă
Livrare economică 30 decembrie 25 - 13 ianuarie 26
Livrare express 13-19 decembrie pentru 30.55 lei
Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76
Specificații
ISBN-13: 9781009114851
ISBN-10: 1009114859
Pagini: 340
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.49 kg
Editura: Cambridge University Press
ISBN-10: 1009114859
Pagini: 340
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 18 mm
Greutate: 0.49 kg
Editura: Cambridge University Press
Cuprins
1. Introduction: the Main Problem (P); Part I. The State of the Art: 2. Approaches to inconsistency in the philosophy of science; 3. Approaches to inconsistency in linguistic theorising; Part II. Paraconsistency: 4. The paraconsistent treatment of inconsistency; 5. Prospects and limits of the paraconsistent treatment of inconsistency; Part III. Plausible Argumentation: 6. From paraconsistency to plausible argumentation; 7. Inconsistency and theory change; 8. The treatment of inconsistency in Optimality Theory; 9. The heuristics of inconsistency resolution; Part IV. Summary: 10. The methodological background; 11. Conclusions.
Recenzii
'The authors provide a systematic treatment of the role of inconsistency in linguistic usage. Their discussion is thoroughly grounded in the literature of inconsistency in contemporary linguistics, semantics, logic, rhetoric, and philosophy. Their innovative perspectives and proposed solutions to problems will interest everyone who works in this challenging area.' Nicholas Rescher, Distinguished University Professor of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh
'While inconsistencies have traditionally been regarded as fatal glitches that needed to be eliminated from theories and descriptions, Kertész and Rákosi demonstrate that although consistency remains a fundamental desideratum, there are inconsistencies that are tolerable and that the emergence and resolution of inconsistencies are a natural part of linguistic argumentation. The authors' model throws new light on the nature of linguistic theorizing by offering a unified framework that integrates inconsistencies whether arising between data of a particular kind, or between different kinds of data, or different theories, or different descriptions.' Edith A. Moravcsik, Emeritus Professor of Linguistics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
'While inconsistencies have traditionally been regarded as fatal glitches that needed to be eliminated from theories and descriptions, Kertész and Rákosi demonstrate that although consistency remains a fundamental desideratum, there are inconsistencies that are tolerable and that the emergence and resolution of inconsistencies are a natural part of linguistic argumentation. The authors' model throws new light on the nature of linguistic theorizing by offering a unified framework that integrates inconsistencies whether arising between data of a particular kind, or between different kinds of data, or different theories, or different descriptions.' Edith A. Moravcsik, Emeritus Professor of Linguistics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee