Cantitate/Preț
Produs

Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science: Current Controversies in Philosophy

Editat de Shamik Dasgupta, Ravit Dotan, Brad Weslake
en Limba Engleză Hardback – 28 oct 2020
Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science asks twelve philosophers to debate six questions that are driving contemporary work in this area of philosophy. The questions are:
I. Are Boltzmann Brains Bad?
II. Does Mathematical Explanation Require Mathematical Truth?
III. Does Quantum Mechanics Suggest Spacetime is Nonfundamental?
IV. Is Evolution Fundamental When It Comes to Defining Biological Ontology?
V. Is Chance Ontologically Fundamental?
VI. Are Sexes Natural Kinds?
These debates explore the philosophical foundations of particular scientific disciplines, while also examining more general issues in the philosophy of science. The result is a book that’s perfect for the advanced philosophy student, building up their knowledge of the foundations of the field and engaging with its cutting-edge questions. Preliminary descriptions of each chapter, annotated lists of further readings for each controversy, and study questions for each chapter help provide clearer and richer snapshots of active controversies for all readers.
Citește tot Restrânge

Toate formatele și edițiile

Toate formatele și edițiile Preț Express
Paperback (1) 37460 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 31 mai 2023 37460 lei  6-8 săpt.
Hardback (1) 101377 lei  6-8 săpt.
  Taylor & Francis – 28 oct 2020 101377 lei  6-8 săpt.

Din seria Current Controversies in Philosophy

Preț: 101377 lei

Preț vechi: 123631 lei
-18% Nou

Puncte Express: 1521

Preț estimativ în valută:
17944 20917$ 15693£

Carte tipărită la comandă

Livrare economică 20 ianuarie-03 februarie 26

Preluare comenzi: 021 569.72.76

Specificații

ISBN-13: 9781138825772
ISBN-10: 1138825778
Pagini: 212
Ilustrații: 10
Dimensiuni: 152 x 229 x 20 mm
Greutate: 0.45 kg
Ediția:1
Editura: Taylor & Francis
Colecția Routledge
Seria Current Controversies in Philosophy

Locul publicării:Oxford, United Kingdom

Cuprins

Introduction  Part I: Are Boltzmann Brains Bad?  1. Why Boltzmann Brains Are Bad  2. What Follows from the Possibility of Boltzmann Brains?  Part II: Does Mathematical Explanation Require Mathematical Truth?  3. Mathematical Explanation Requires Mathematical Truth  4. Mathematical Explanation Doesn’t Require Mathematical Truth  Part III: Does Quantum Mechanics Suggest Spacetime is Non-fundamental?  5. Against Wavefunction Realism  6. Separability, Locality, and Higher Dimensions in Quantum Mechanics  Part IV: Is Evolution Fundamental When it Comes to Defining Biological Ontology?  7. Is Evolution Fundamental When It Comes to Biological Ontology?  8. Is Evolution Fundamental When It Comes to Defining Biological Ontology? Yes  Part V: Is Chance Ontologically Fundamental?  9. Chance and the Great Divide  10. On Chance (or, Why I am Only a Half-Humean)  Part VI: Are Sexes Natural Kinds?  11. Are Sexes Natural Kinds?  12 The Animal Sexes as Historical Explanatory Kinds

Notă biografică

Shamik Dasgupta is Associate Professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, where he has taught since 2016. He works in metaphysics, philosophy of science, and value theory.
Ravit Dotan is a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley. She specializes in epistemology, philosophy of science, and philosophy of machine learning.
Brad Weslake is Associate Professor of Philosophy at NYU Shanghai. His central research interest is philosophy of science, especially causation and explanation.

Descriere

Philosophers debate six big questions: Are Boltzmann Brains Bad? Does Mathematical Explanation Require Mathematical Truth? Does Quantum Mechanics Suggest Spacetime is Non-Fundamental? Is Evolution Fundamental When It Comes to Defining Biological Ontology? Is Chance Ontologically Fundamental? Are Sexes Natural Kinds?